BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18442771)

  • 1. Recent trends in mammography utilization in the Medicare population: is there a cause for concern?
    Rao VM; Levin DC; Parker L; Frangos AJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 18442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates.
    Boroumand G; Teberian I; Parker L; Rao VM; Levin DC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 29570370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of the controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on the use of screening mammography.
    Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23290669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent trends in utilization rates of noncardiac thoracic imaging: an example of how imaging growth might be controlled.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Dec; 4(12):886-9. PubMed ID: 18047983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography for Oklahoma Medicare beneficiaries: a national priority for quality improvement.
    Venkatappa S; Oehlert WH; Nguyen L; Austelle A; Bratzler DW
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 95(10):655-60. PubMed ID: 12420415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Intenzo CM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jun; 6(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 19467490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: a 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Pampati V; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):9-34. PubMed ID: 19165296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):744-7. PubMed ID: 18514954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing mammography rates for Medicaid recipients age 50 to 65 years using claims data from a southeastern state.
    Lucey C; Kumar S
    J La State Med Soc; 1996 Jul; 148(7):303-8. PubMed ID: 8816025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
    Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
    Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of the Controversial US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations on the Use of Screening Mammography.
    Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):e58-e61. PubMed ID: 27814825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internal validation of procedure codes on Medicare claims for digital mammograms and computer-aided detection.
    Fenton JJ; Green P; Baldwin LM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Aug; 18(8):2186-9. PubMed ID: 19661075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in diagnostic testing following a national guideline for evaluation of dyspepsia.
    Schwartz LM; Woloshin S; Welch HG
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Apr; 156(8):873-5. PubMed ID: 8774206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?
    Breen N; A Cronin K; Meissner HI; Taplin SH; Tangka FK; Tiro JA; McNeel TS
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2405-9. PubMed ID: 17503429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nationwide trends in rates of utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the Medicare population between 1993 and 1999.
    Maitino AJ; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM; Sunshine JH
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 12668743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting mammography--audit recommendations in a lower-incidence Taiwanese population.
    Chen CY; Tzeng WS; Tsai CC; Mak CW; Chen CH; Chou MC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):978-85. PubMed ID: 18755438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent shifts in place of service for noninvasive diagnostic imaging: have hospitals missed an opportunity?
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 19179236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current practice patterns and recent trends in breast biopsy among radiologists and surgeons.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Frangos AJ; Parker L; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):707-9. PubMed ID: 17412153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening Mammography Rates in the Medicare Population before and after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guideline Change: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
    Jiang M; Hughes DR; Duszak R
    Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 25965155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000-2006: a population-based analysis.
    Ryerson AB; Miller JW; Eheman CR; Leadbetter S; White MC
    Prev Med; 2008 Nov; 47(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18602946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.