These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Hughes CM; Reissig P; Seegelke C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21663882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task. Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anticipating different grips reduces bimanual end-state comfort: A tradeoff between goal-related and means-related planning processes. Seegelke C; Weigelt M PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190586. PubMed ID: 29309417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of endpoint congruency on bimanual transport and rotation tasks. Mason AH; Bryden PJ Front Psychol; 2015; 6():92. PubMed ID: 25713546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance. van der Wel RP; Rosenbaum DA Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 205(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 20658129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different coupling for the reach and grasp components in bimanual prehension movements. Dohle C; Ostermann G; Hefter H; Freund HJ Neuroreport; 2000 Nov; 11(17):3787-91. PubMed ID: 11117492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Object and Task Properties on Bimanual Transport. Nakamura YC; O'Sullivan CA; Pollard NS J Mot Behav; 2019; 51(3):245-258. PubMed ID: 29741471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of unimanual and bimanual multiphased prehensile movements. Mason AH J Mot Behav; 2007 Jul; 39(4):291-305. PubMed ID: 17664171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hand preferences on unimanual and bimanual tasks in Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana). Canteloup C; Vauclair J; Meunier H Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Nov; 152(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 24000087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task. Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing. Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hand preference for unimanual and bimanual tasks: Evidence from questionnaires and preferential reaching. Salters D; Scharoun Benson SM Laterality; 2022 May; 27(3):308-323. PubMed ID: 34658296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shared right-hemispheric representations of sensorimotor goals in dynamic task environments. Le A; Wall FB; Lin G; Arunthavarajah R; Niemeier M Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):977-987. PubMed ID: 30694342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The right anterior intraparietal sulcus is critical for bimanual grasping: a TMS study. Le A; Vesia M; Yan X; Niemeier M; Crawford JD Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2591-603. PubMed ID: 23645719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Manual laterality and strategy use for a coordinated bimanual task requiring precise and power grip in guenons and mangabeys. Maille A; Rossard A; Blois-Heulin C Am J Primatol; 2013 Nov; 75(11):1096-107. PubMed ID: 23776065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks. Tresilian JR; Stelmach GE Exp Brain Res; 1997 Jun; 115(2):283-99. PubMed ID: 9224856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]