These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18443819)

  • 1. The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: evidence from manipulating response-code overlap.
    Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2009 May; 73(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 18443819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 20516229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.
    Stelzel C; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):476-90. PubMed ID: 21811837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response preparation and code overlap in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Prinz W
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1085-95. PubMed ID: 16496728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.
    Bratzke D; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):605-617. PubMed ID: 31974636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory-motor modality compatibility.
    Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Defer A; Ibrahime S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):752-772. PubMed ID: 29285603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Allen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 11999862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs.
    Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 28956154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crosstalk, not resource competition, as a source of dual-task costs: Evidence from manipulating stimulus-action effect conceptual compatibility.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1224-1232. PubMed ID: 33689145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.