BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18444522)

  • 1. Multisensory identification of natural objects in a two-way crossmodal priming paradigm.
    Schneider TR; Engel AK; Debener S
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 18444522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced EEG gamma-band activity reflects multisensory semantic matching in visual-to-auditory object priming.
    Schneider TR; Debener S; Oostenveld R; Engel AK
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1244-54. PubMed ID: 18617422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of unattended emotional visual scenes.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):347-69. PubMed ID: 17696688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1554-68. PubMed ID: 21688942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impairments in multisensory processing are not universal to the autism spectrum: no evidence for crossmodal priming deficits in Asperger syndrome.
    David N; R Schneider T; Vogeley K; Engel AK
    Autism Res; 2011 Oct; 4(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 21882310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multisensory interactions between auditory and haptic object recognition.
    Kassuba T; Menz MM; Röder B; Siebner HR
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 May; 23(5):1097-107. PubMed ID: 22518017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses.
    Spruyt A; De Houwer J; Hermans D; Eelen P
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 17341014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model.
    Ulrich R; Nitschke J; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1140-52. PubMed ID: 17355038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of semantically congruent and incongruent visual information on auditory object recognition across development.
    Thomas RL; Nardini M; Mareschal D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Oct; 162():72-88. PubMed ID: 28595113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming outside of awareness and subsequent stimulus identification.
    Dietrich D; Theios J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Oct; 75(2):483-93. PubMed ID: 1408610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.
    van Atteveldt NM; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1345-60. PubMed ID: 17513133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual adaptation enhances action sound discrimination.
    Barraclough NE; Page SA; Keefe BD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):320-332. PubMed ID: 27604284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming.
    Buchner A; Zabal A; Mayr S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 15000539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A matter of attention: Crossmodal congruence enhances and impairs performance in a novel trimodal matching paradigm.
    Misselhorn J; Daume J; Engel AK; Friese U
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():113-122. PubMed ID: 26209356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
    Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination.
    Thelen A; Talsma D; Murray MM
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():148-60. PubMed ID: 25743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.