397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18444760)
1. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
Unsworth N; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?
Oberauer K; Bialkova S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.
Schmiedek F; Oberauer K; Wilhelm O; Süss HM; Wittmann WW
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):414-29. PubMed ID: 17696691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Working memory costs of task switching.
Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.
Unsworth N
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 20022311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
Schneider DW; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
Schneider DW; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.
Ackerman PL; Beier ME; Boyle MO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Dec; 131(4):567-89. PubMed ID: 12500864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning, working memory, and intelligence revisited.
Tamez E; Myerson J; Hale S
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 18308483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.
Jaeggi SM; Buschkuehl M; Perrig WJ; Meier B
Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 20408039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The focus of attention in working memory: evidence from a word updating task.
Janczyk M; Grabowski J
Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 21287425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two dissociable updating processes in working memory.
Kessler Y; Meiran N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1339-48. PubMed ID: 18980398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ageing and switching of the focus of attention in working memory: results from a modified N-back task.
Verhaeghen P; Basak C
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jan; 58(1):134-54. PubMed ID: 15881295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of affective valence on working memory processes.
Gotoh F
Int J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 22023500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
Huang L; Mo L; Li Y
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping the developmental constraints on working memory span performance.
Bayliss DM; Jarrold C; Baddeley AD; Gunn DM; Leigh E
Dev Psychol; 2005 Jul; 41(4):579-97. PubMed ID: 16060806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
Lange EB; Verhaeghen P
Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?
Portrat S; Barrouillet P; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1561-4. PubMed ID: 18980415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
