211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18444761)
1. Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes.
Cattaneo Z; Vecchi T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 18444761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of reduced visual acuity on age-related decline in spatial working memory: an investigation.
Cattaneo Z; Bhatt E; Merabet LB; Pece A; Vecchi T
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Nov; 15(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 18608051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developmental trends in haptic and visual free classifications: influence of stimulus structure and exploration on decisional processes.
Berger C; Hatwell Y
J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Dec; 63(3):447-65. PubMed ID: 8953223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical activation patterns during long-term memory retrieval of visually or haptically encoded objects and locations.
Stock O; Röder B; Burke M; Bien S; Rösler F
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):58-82. PubMed ID: 18476766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term memory for spatial configurations in the tactile modality: a comparison with vision.
Picard D; Monnier C
Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):789-801. PubMed ID: 19606379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
Hodgson E; Waller D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer.
Intraub H
Cognition; 2004 Nov; 94(1):19-37. PubMed ID: 15302326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
Craddock M; Lawson R
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1350-65. PubMed ID: 18927018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multisensory integration in the Muller-Lyer illusion: from vision to haptics.
Mancini F; Bricolo E; Vallar G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):818-30. PubMed ID: 19728224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of late visual impairment on mental representations activated by visual and tactile stimuli.
Cattaneo Z; Vecchi T; Monegato M; Pece A; Cornoldi C
Brain Res; 2007 May; 1148():170-6. PubMed ID: 17368576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distributed and associative working memory.
Zhou YD; Ardestani A; Fuster JM
Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():i77-87. PubMed ID: 17615249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing?
Millar S; Al-Attar Z
Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):258-68. PubMed ID: 16154677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?
Oberauer K; Bialkova S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [EEG correlates of the change in information processing strategy in visual imagery].
Sviderskaia NE; Taratynova GV; Kozhedub RG
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2005; 55(5):624-32. PubMed ID: 16316023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution.
Poirier C; De Volder AG; Scheiber C
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2007; 31(7):1064-70. PubMed ID: 17688948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aging and integrating spatial mental models.
Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
Psychol Aging; 2007 Sep; 22(3):569-79. PubMed ID: 17874955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of vision on haptic encoding processes.
Locher PJ
Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Aug; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 7133922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
