These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18445075)

  • 1. Influence of representation targets on the total area of conservation-area networks.
    Justus J; Fuller T; Sarkar S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 18445075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of surrogate taxa for the representation of biodiversity.
    Lewandowski AS; Noss RF; Parsons DR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 20455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna.
    Urbina-Cardona JN; Flores-Villela O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1031-41. PubMed ID: 20345399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coral reef habitats as surrogates of species, ecological functions, and ecosystem services.
    Mumby PJ; Broad K; Brumbaugh DR; Dahlgren CP; Harborne AR; Hastings A; Holmes KE; Kappel CV; Micheli F; Sanchirico JN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 18477024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning.
    Rondinini C; Wilson KA; Boitani L; Grantham H; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Oct; 9(10):1136-45. PubMed ID: 16972877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using ecological-niche modeling as a conservation tool for freshwater species: live-bearing fishes in central Mexico.
    Domínguez-Domínguez O; Martínez-Meyer E; Zambrano L; De León GP
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1730-9. PubMed ID: 17181808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity.
    Rodrigues AS; Andelman SJ; Bakarr MI; Boitani L; Brooks TM; Cowling RM; Fishpool LD; Da Fonseca GA; Gaston KJ; Hoffmann M; Long JS; Marquet PA; Pilgrim JD; Pressey RL; Schipper J; Sechrest W; Stuart SN; Underhill LG; Waller RW; Watts ME; Yan X
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):640-3. PubMed ID: 15071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protected areas in Europe: principle and practice.
    Gaston KJ; Jackson SF; Nagy A; Cantú-Salazar L; Johnson M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1134():97-119. PubMed ID: 18566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying conservation areas on the basis of alternative distribution data sets.
    Underwood JG; D'Agrosa C; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 19659686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The capacity of Australia's protected-area system to represent threatened species.
    Watson JE; Evans MC; Carwardine J; Fuller RA; Joseph LN; Segan DB; Taylor MF; Fensham RJ; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 20961332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of planning for connectivity on linear reserve networks.
    Lentini PE; Gibbons P; Carwardine J; Fischer J; Drielsma M; Martin TG
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):796-807. PubMed ID: 23647073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transferability of species distribution models: a functional habitat approach for two regionally threatened butterflies.
    Vanreusel W; Maes D; Van Dyck H
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 17298526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of coarse-resolution models of species' distributions to guide local conservation inferences.
    Barbosa AM; Real R; Vargas JM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1378-87. PubMed ID: 20455912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the performance of indicator groups for the identification of important areas for species conservation.
    Larsen FW; Bladt J; Rahbek C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):731-40. PubMed ID: 17531051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-level discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: what we have and what we need for the global village.
    Bertzky M; Stoll-Kleemann S
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 18207633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents.
    Arponen A; Lehtomäki J; Leppänen J; Tomppo E; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 22268786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach.
    Arponen A; Kondelin H; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 17391202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating environmental gap analysis with spatial conservation prioritization: a case study from Victoria, Australia.
    Sharafi SM; Moilanen A; White M; Burgman M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():240-51. PubMed ID: 22935646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Projected impacts of climate change on a continent-wide protected area network.
    Hole DG; Willis SG; Pain DJ; Fishpool LD; Butchart SH; Collingham YC; Rahbek C; Huntley B
    Ecol Lett; 2009 May; 12(5):420-31. PubMed ID: 19379136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using abiotic variables to predict importance of sites for species representation.
    Albuquerque F; Beier P
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1390-400. PubMed ID: 25959590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.