These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18445075)
41. A review of selection-based tests of abiotic surrogates for species representation. Beier P; Sutcliffe P; Hjort J; Faith DP; Pressey RL; Albuquerque F Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):668-79. PubMed ID: 25923191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region. Bowker MA; Miller ME; Belnap J; Sisk TD; Johnson NC Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1533-43. PubMed ID: 18759770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A critical assessment of the use of surrogate species in conservation planning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California (U.S.A.). Murphy DD; Weiland PS; Cummins KW Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21790783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reserve networks based on richness hotspots and representation vary with scale. Shriner SA; Wilson KR; Flather CH Ecol Appl; 2006 Oct; 16(5):1660-73. PubMed ID: 17069361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection. Perhans K; Kindstrand C; Boman M; Djupström LB; Gustafsson L; Mattsson L; Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Wikberg S Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18637912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Shen G; Feng C; Xie Z; Ouyang Z; Li J; Pascal M Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 18954340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica. Barton DN; Faith DP; Rusch GM; Acevedo H; Paniagua L; Castro M J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):901-11. PubMed ID: 18423841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of approximate inference in an index of completeness of biological inventories. Nakamura M; Soberón J Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):469-74. PubMed ID: 19040655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Use of surrogates to predict the stressor response of imperiled species. Wenger SJ Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1564-71. PubMed ID: 18680507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Delaying conservation actions for improved knowledge: how long should we wait? Grantham HS; Wilson KA; Moilanen A; Rebelo T; Possingham HP Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 19243409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Monitoring of biological diversity: a common-ground approach. Teder T; Moora M; Roosaluste E; Zobel K; Pärtel M; Kõljalg U; Zobel M Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 17391181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A behaviorally explicit demographic model integrating habitat selection and population dynamics in california sea lions. González-Suárez M; Gerber LR Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1608-18. PubMed ID: 18680502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A probabilistic model of reserve design. Bascompte J; Luque B; Olarrea J; Lacasa L J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(1):205-11. PubMed ID: 17418238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The importance of being spatial (and reserved): assessing northern spotted owl habitat relationships with hierarchical Bayesian models. Carroll C; Johnson DS Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):1026-36. PubMed ID: 18477026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Tallis H; Polasky S Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():265-83. PubMed ID: 19432652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The ecological future of the North American bison: conceiving long-term, large-scale conservation of wildlife. Sanderson EW; Redford KH; Weber B; Aune K; Baldes D; Berger J; Carter D; Curtin C; Derr J; Dobrott S; Fearn E; Fleener C; Forrest S; Gerlach C; Gates CC; Gross JE; Gogan P; Grassel S; Hilty JA; Jensen M; Kunkel K; Lammers D; List R; Minkowski K; Olson T; Pague C; Robertson PB; Stephenson B Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):252-66. PubMed ID: 18402580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Potential distribution of jaguar, Panthera onca (Carnivora: Felidae) in Guerrero, Mexico: persistence of areas for its conservation]. Cuervo-Robayo AP; Monroy-Vilchis O Rev Biol Trop; 2012 Sep; 60(3):1357-67. PubMed ID: 23025104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A two-part measure of degree of invasion for cross-community comparisons. Guo Q; Symstad A Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 18477032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Systematic conservation planning and the cost of tackling conservation conflicts with large carnivores in Italy. Rondinini C; Boitani L Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1455-62. PubMed ID: 18173469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Use of modified threat reduction assessments to estimate success of conservation measures within and adjacent to Kruger National Park, South Africa. Anthony BP Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1497-505. PubMed ID: 18759776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]