These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18445076)

  • 21. Integrated monitoring and information systems for managing aquatic invasive species in a changing climate.
    Lee H; Reusser DA; Olden JD; Smith SS; Graham J; Burkett V; Dukes JS; Piorkowski RJ; McPhedran J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 18577087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monitoring of biological diversity: a common-ground approach.
    Teder T; Moora M; Roosaluste E; Zobel K; Pärtel M; Kõljalg U; Zobel M
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 17391181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sampling strategies to evaluate the status of offshore soft sediment assemblages.
    Rogers SI; Somerfield PJ; Schratzberger M; Warwick R; Maxwell TA; Ellis JR
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 May; 56(5):880-94. PubMed ID: 18353403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intelligent monitoring networks--transformation of data into information for water management.
    Winkler S; Zessner M; Saracevic E; Fleischmann N
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 18701780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring?
    Bash JS; Ryan CM
    Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):877-85. PubMed ID: 11992178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monitoring cryptic amphibians and reptiles in a Florida state park.
    Engeman RM; Meshaka WE; Severson R; Severson MA; Kaufman G; Groninger NP; Smith HT
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(7):7032-7. PubMed ID: 26739988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Managing aquatic species of conservation concern in the face of climate change and invasive species.
    Rahel FJ; Bierwagen B; Taniguchi Y
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):551-61. PubMed ID: 18577084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Technical quality of fauna monitoring programs in the environmental impact assessments of large mining projects in southeastern Brazil.
    Dias AMDS; Fonseca A; Paglia AP
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 1):216-223. PubMed ID: 30196222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: lessons learned.
    Hall TJ; Fisher RP; Rodgers JH; Minshall GW; Landis WG; Kovacs T; Firth BK; Dubé MG; Flinders CA; Deardorff TL; Borton DL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 19115805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ecosystem response to regulatory and management actions: the southern California experience in long-term monitoring.
    Stein ED; Cadien DB
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2009; 59(4-7):91-100. PubMed ID: 19329129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using GIS to generate spatially balanced random survey designs for natural resource applications.
    Theobald DM; Stevens DL; White D; Urquhart NS; Olsen AR; Norman JB
    Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 40(1):134-46. PubMed ID: 17546523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Environmental history: a piece in the puzzle for establishing plans for environmental management.
    Renberg I; Bigler C; Richard Bindler ; Matilda Norberg ; Johan Rydberg ; Ulf Segerström
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2794-800. PubMed ID: 19395150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Delaying conservation actions for improved knowledge: how long should we wait?
    Grantham HS; Wilson KA; Moilanen A; Rebelo T; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 19243409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA.
    Thomsen PF; Kielgast J; Iversen LL; Wiuf C; Rasmussen M; Gilbert MT; Orlando L; Willerslev E
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jun; 21(11):2565-73. PubMed ID: 22151771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the stability of populations of mammals, birds, fish and insects.
    Sibly RM; Barker D; Hone J; Pagel M
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Oct; 10(10):970-6. PubMed ID: 17845297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determining optimal population monitoring for rare butterflies.
    Haddad NM; Hudgens B; Damiani C; Gross K; Kuefler D; Pollock K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):929-40. PubMed ID: 18477025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A decision framework for the adaptive management of an exploited species with implications for marine reserves.
    Gerber LR; Wielgus J; Sala E
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1594-602. PubMed ID: 18173483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring the accuracy of agro-environmental indicators.
    Makowski D; Tichit M; Guichard L; Van Keulen H; Beaudoin N
    J Environ Manage; 2009 May; 90 Suppl 2():S139-46. PubMed ID: 19128870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differences in bioregional classifications among four aquatic biotic groups: implications for conservation reserve design and monitoring programs.
    Growns I
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2652-8. PubMed ID: 19285374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.