402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18445817)
1. Routine audit of large-scale cervical cancer screening programs.
Cuzick J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):605-6. PubMed ID: 18445817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased cervical cancer screening intervals: a risky investment?
Renshaw AA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):137-8. PubMed ID: 14986290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A national population-based screening program for cervical cancer in Israel, need for re-evaluation].
Benshushan A; Antebi SO
Harefuah; 2000 Sep; 139(5-6):217-20. PubMed ID: 11062956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
Calvache AE
Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening campaign: reflections on the experience in Martinique].
Briollais L; Feyler A; Ossondo M; Dorival MJ; Le Mab G; Escarmant P; Azaloux H
Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():21-35. PubMed ID: 10989626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening and prevention: cervical cancer.
Weinstein LC; Buchanan EM; Hillson C; Chambers CV
Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):559-74. PubMed ID: 19616155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevention of cervical cancer.
Denny L
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):18-31. PubMed ID: 19027619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Gynecological screening in Sweden. Report of results and comparison with the cancer registry].
Ericsson J; MattssonB ; Pettersson F
Lakartidningen; 1975 Nov; 72(48):4719-24. PubMed ID: 1195913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening the hard to reach: improving morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in New Zealand.
Sykes P; Sadler L; Priest P
N Z Med J; 2008 Jul; 121(1277):5-7. PubMed ID: 18677325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Medical and social implication of cervical cancer screening].
Prodan CK; Teleman S; Mihailovici MS
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2003; 107(3):524-7. PubMed ID: 14756055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results from a cervical cancer screening programme in Manitoba, Canada.
Choi NW; Nelson NA
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):61-7. PubMed ID: 3570416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening in primary care: issues and recommendations.
Mandelblatt J
Prim Care; 1989 Mar; 16(1):133-55. PubMed ID: 2649899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening programs. III. Components of a practical screening program for carcinoma of the cervix.
Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1027-31. PubMed ID: 1277022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results.
Silfverdal L; Kemetli L; Andrae B; Sparén P; Ryd W; Dillner J; Strander B; Törnberg S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):188.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19560117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [New ways of cervical cancer screening].
Teikari M
Duodecim; 2004; 120(13):1595-6; discussion 1596-7. PubMed ID: 15326967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
Ferriman A
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
