These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18445955)

  • 1. Comparison of efficacy of three commercially available antibiotic discs.
    Joshi A; Iyer V; Balasubramaniam U; Kagal A; Bharadwaj R
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2008; 26(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 18445955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility testing quality control studies with fosfomycin tromethamine.
    Fuchs PC; Barry AL; Brown SD
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Jul; 16(7):538-40. PubMed ID: 9272392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance from disk test results for comparative purposes.
    Kronvall G; Kahlmeter G; Myhre E; Galas MF
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Feb; 9(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 12588332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab and disc methods.
    Snell JJ; Danvers MV; Gardner PS
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Sep; 37(9):1059-65. PubMed ID: 6432855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing quality control ranges for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus: a cornerstone to develop reference strains for Korean clinical microbiology laboratories.
    Hong SK; Choi SJ; Shin S; Lee W; Pinto N; Shin N; Lee K; Hong SG; Kim YA; Lee H; Kim H; Song W; Lee SH; Yong D; Lee K; Chong Y
    Ann Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 35(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 26354353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility at a University teaching hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study.
    Kassim A; Omuse G; Premji Z; Revathi G
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2016 Apr; 15():21. PubMed ID: 27068515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Standardization of methods of determining microbial sensitivity to antibiotics].
    Chaĭkovskaia SM; Givental' NI; Rezvan SP
    Lab Delo; 1984; (5):299-302. PubMed ID: 6204116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of control organism zone diameters for batches of IsoSensitest agar manufactured from 1996 to 2000 using the BSAC disc susceptibility test method.
    Landrygan J; James PA; Brooks D; Kubiak EM
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2002 Feb; 49(2):391-4. PubMed ID: 11815586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates].
    Acuner IC; Bayramoğlu G; Birinci A; Cekiç Cihan C; Bek Y; Durupınar B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Routine test for sensitivity (author's transl)].
    Wiedemann B
    Immun Infekt; 1978 Dec; 6(6):209-13. PubMed ID: 103803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antibacterial effects of lidocaine and adrenaline.
    Kesici S; Demirci M; Kesici U
    Int Wound J; 2019 Oct; 16(5):1190-1194. PubMed ID: 31407479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: a Belgian multicenter study.
    Lauwers S; Philippe J; Van Zeebroeck A; Pierard D; Derde MP; Kaufman L
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991 Aug; 10(8):652-6. PubMed ID: 1748119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disk method. Comparative evaluation of 5 commercial systems].
    Margalejo H; Brun Y; Messy P; Fleurette J
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1984 Jun; 32(5 Pt 2):483-7. PubMed ID: 6431378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Interlaboratory quality control of the agar diffusion test for determining sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics].
    Garanina EN; Givental' NI; Andreeva ZM; Verenchikova IaV; Ginzburg AI
    Lab Delo; 1984; (1):43-6. PubMed ID: 6199568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory evaluation of a commercial microbial control system.
    Borchardt KA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 May; 9(5):771-5. PubMed ID: 821389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposed mezlocillin disk control values for staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853.
    Prior RB; Fass RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Mar; 77(3):332-3. PubMed ID: 6462053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control of agar diffusion susceptibility tests. Data from the Quality Assurance Service Microbiology Program of the College of American Pathologists.
    Knowles RC; Moore TD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):581-5. PubMed ID: 6776805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing for clinical and epidemiologic purposes.
    Graham DR; Dixon RE; Hughes JM; Thornsberry C
    Am J Infect Control; 1985 Dec; 13(6):241-9. PubMed ID: 3936382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUCAST Definitive Document E.DEF 3.1, June 2000: Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution.
    European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Dieases (ESCMID)
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2000 Sep; 6(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 11168187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Standard dried nutrient medium for determining microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics].
    Gridneva NI; Medzhidov MM
    Antibiot Med Biotekhnol; 1985 Nov; 30(11):837-9. PubMed ID: 3937486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.