319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18446038)
1. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
Zhang J; McPherson B
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Stuart A; Phillips DP; Green WB
Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise.
Bhattacharya A; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17672655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Categorical dependence of vowel detection in long-term speech-shaped noise.
Liu C; Eddins DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4539-46. PubMed ID: 18537402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects.
Liu D; Shi LF
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23800810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure.
Zheng Y; Meng ZL; Wang K; Tao Y; Xu K; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 19726935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
Shi LF; Doherty KA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
Summers V; Cord MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of fitting formulas in programmable hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise.
Dündar SE; Aksoy S
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007; 17(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 18187987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the California Consonant Test in evaluating hearing aids.
Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Simmons FJ
Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 3963153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
Plyler PN; Fleck EL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Santurette S; Dau T
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
