These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18446282)

  • 1. Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.
    Guvench O; MacKerell AD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():63-88. PubMed ID: 18446282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues.
    Mackerell AD
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1584-604. PubMed ID: 15264253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine "dipeptides" (Ace-Ala-Nme and Ace-Gly-Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution.
    Hu H; Elstner M; Hermans J
    Proteins; 2003 Feb; 50(3):451-63. PubMed ID: 12557187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Price DJ; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Aug; 23(11):1045-57. PubMed ID: 12116391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of the CHARMM27 force field with united-atom lipid force fields.
    Sapay N; Tieleman DP
    J Comput Chem; 2011 May; 32(7):1400-10. PubMed ID: 21425293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Mackerell AD; Feig M; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1400-15. PubMed ID: 15185334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function.
    Klepeis JL; Lindorff-Larsen K; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19361980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CHARMM additive and polarizable force fields for biophysics and computer-aided drug design.
    Vanommeslaeghe K; MacKerell AD
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1850(5):861-871. PubMed ID: 25149274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Force field validation for nucleic acid simulations: comparing energies and dynamics of a DNA dodecamer.
    Jha S; Coveney PV; Laughton CA
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Nov; 26(15):1617-27. PubMed ID: 16170796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular dynamics of DNA: comparison of force fields and terminal nucleotide definitions.
    Ricci CG; de Andrade AS; Mottin M; Netz PA
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Aug; 114(30):9882-93. PubMed ID: 20614923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
    Lee MC; Duan Y
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How sensitive are nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of proteins to changes in the force field?
    Villa A; Fan H; Wassenaar T; Mark AE
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 May; 111(21):6015-25. PubMed ID: 17489626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions.
    Wang W; Donini O; Reyes CM; Kollman PA
    Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct; 2001; 30():211-43. PubMed ID: 11340059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RedMD--reduced molecular dynamics package.
    Górecki A; Szypowski M; Długosz M; Trylska J
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Nov; 30(14):2364-73. PubMed ID: 19247989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An improved OPLS-AA force field for carbohydrates.
    Kony D; Damm W; Stoll S; Van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Nov; 23(15):1416-29. PubMed ID: 12370944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using PC clusters to evaluate the transferability of molecular mechanics force fields for proteins.
    Okur A; Strockbine B; Hornak V; Simmerling C
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Jan; 24(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12483672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids.
    MacKerell AD; Banavali N; Foloppe N
    Biopolymers; 2000-2001; 56(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 11754339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.
    Oostenbrink C; Villa A; Mark AE; van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1656-76. PubMed ID: 15264259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing atomistic and coarse-grained force fields for protein-lipid interactions: the formidable challenge of an ionizable side chain in a membrane.
    Vorobyov I; Li L; Allen TW
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Aug; 112(32):9588-602. PubMed ID: 18636764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new GROMOS force field for hexopyranose-based carbohydrates.
    Lins RD; Hünenberger PH
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Oct; 26(13):1400-12. PubMed ID: 16035088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.