These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18446289)
41. Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Schueler-Furman O; Wang C; Bradley P; Misura K; Baker D Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5748):638-42. PubMed ID: 16254179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Molecular modeling as a tool for drug discovery. Barcellos GB; Pauli I; Caceres RA; Timmers LF; Dias R; de Azevedo WF Curr Drug Targets; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1084-91. PubMed ID: 19128219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. FAMSD: A powerful protein modeling platform that combines alignment methods, homology modeling, 3D structure quality estimation and molecular dynamics. Kanou K; Iwadate M; Hirata T; Terashi G; Umeyama H; Takeda-Shitaka M Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2009 Dec; 57(12):1335-42. PubMed ID: 19952440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A guide to biochemical systems modeling of sphingolipids for the biochemist. Sims KJ; Alvarez-Vasquez F; Voit EO; Hannun YA Methods Enzymol; 2007; 432():319-50. PubMed ID: 17954223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Automated protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL Workspace and the Protein Model Portal. Bordoli L; Schwede T Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():107-36. PubMed ID: 22323219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling. Fiser A; Feig M; Brooks CL; Sali A Acc Chem Res; 2002 Jun; 35(6):413-21. PubMed ID: 12069626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The role of molecular modelling in biomedical research. Tramontano A FEBS Lett; 2006 May; 580(12):2928-34. PubMed ID: 16647064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Protein structure prediction in 2002. Schonbrun J; Wedemeyer WJ; Baker D Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2002 Jun; 12(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 12127454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [A polyempiric method of modeling protein spatial structure using tritium planigraphy. II. Stacking order determines structure]. Bogacheva EN; Moroz AP; Shishkov AV; Baratova LA Mol Biol (Mosk); 1996; 30(4):885-92. PubMed ID: 8965823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. New tips for structure prediction by comparative modeling. Rayan A Bioinformation; 2009; 3(6):263-7. PubMed ID: 19255646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Visualizing the medical modeling and simulation database: trends in the research literature. Combs CD; Walia M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():83-8. PubMed ID: 18391262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Criteria for evaluating protein structures derived from comparative modeling. Venclovas C; Zemla A; Fidelis K; Moult J Proteins; 1997; Suppl 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 9485490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Generation of protein structures for the 21(st) century. Stevens RC Structure; 2007 Dec; 15(12):1517-9. PubMed ID: 18073098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Identification of antagonists to the vasotocin receptor sub-type 4 (VT4R) involved in stress by molecular modelling and verification using anterior pituitary cells. Jayanthi S; Kang SW; Bingham D; Tessaro BA; Kumar TKS; Kuenzel WJ J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2014 Apr; 32(4):648-660. PubMed ID: 23672311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Systematic assessment of accuracy of comparative model of proteins belonging to different structural fold classes. Chakravarty S; Ghersi D; Sanchez R J Mol Model; 2011 Nov; 17(11):2831-7. PubMed ID: 21301906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]