These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18446413)

  • 1. Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals.
    Foos DH; Sehnert WJ; Reiner B; Siegel EL; Segal A; Waldman DL
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Mar; 22(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 18446413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
    Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study.
    Atkinson S; Neep M; Starkey D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Mar; 67(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 31318181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital radiography reject analysis: A comparison between two radiology departments in New Zealand.
    Bantas G; Sweeney RJ; Mdletshe S
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Jun; 70(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 36657740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis and Economic Implication of X-Ray Film Reject in Diagnostic Radiology Department of Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.
    Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Jul; 27(4):421-426. PubMed ID: 29217944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography.
    Jones AK; Polman R; Willis CE; Shepard SJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Apr; 24(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 19885636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
    Roohi Shalemaei R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit.
    Stephenson-Smith B; Neep MJ; Rowntree P
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 33826800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-centre digital radiography reject analysis for different clinical room use types: The establishment of local reject reference levels for public hospital departments.
    Serra D; Neep MJ; Ryan E
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38845126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reject Analysis in Digital Radiography and Computed Tomography: A Belgian Imaging Department Case Study.
    Haddad L; Saleme H; Howarth N; Tack D
    J Belg Soc Radiol; 2023; 107(1):100. PubMed ID: 38144871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
    Gadeholt G; Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Asp T
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT quality assurance in the mid 1980s. Part 2.
    Burkhart RL; McCrohan JL; Shuman FG
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Jul; 16(7):27-8, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10287001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image reject analysis and rejection causes in digital radiography at a university hospital through estimates of patient doses.
    Calatayud-Jordán J; Campayo-Esteban JM; Gras-Miralles P; Villaescusa-Blanca JI
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Mar; 200(3):274-284. PubMed ID: 38123462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause - A National Maltese Study.
    Mercieca N; Portelli JL; Jadva-Patel H
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28290336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new concept in radiology QA in a large setting.
    Tomlinson D; Stapleman K
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 10179190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard.
    Minnigh TR; Gallet J
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Mar; 22(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 18270779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel quality assurance method in a university teaching paediatric radiology department.
    Gallet JM; Reed MH; Hlady J
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):843-6. PubMed ID: 11026859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographers' experiences of the management of quality assurance programmes in public hospitals, South Africa.
    Willemse MM; Williams M; Grobler AD
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Feb; 26(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 31902462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.