These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1844696)

  • 1. Assessment of bioequivalence using a multiplicative model.
    Chow SC; Peace KE; Shao J
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 1844696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioequivalence and intrasubject variability.
    Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 1844697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Average bioequivalence for two-sequence two-period crossover design with incomplete data.
    Lee JY; Kim BC; Park SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):857-67. PubMed ID: 16078389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new approach for outliers in a bioavailability/bioequivalence study.
    Liao JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):393-405. PubMed ID: 17479389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On assessment of bioequivalence under a higher-order crossover design.
    Chow SC; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):239-56. PubMed ID: 1300216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of individual and population bioequivalence using the probability that bioavailabilities are similar.
    Schall R
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):615-26. PubMed ID: 7662849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal sampling times in bioequivalence tests.
    Kong FH; Gonin R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Feb; 10(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 10709799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
    Vuorinen J; Turunen J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2635-55. PubMed ID: 8981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extension to the use of tolerance intervals for the assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Esinhart JD; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 8019583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On TIER method for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Ju HL
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 9056589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative confidence intervals for the assessment of bioequivalence in four-period cross-over designs.
    Quiroz J; Ting N; Wei GC; Burdick RK
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1825-47. PubMed ID: 12111892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical aspects of comparative bioavailability trials.
    Westlake WJ
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 583027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A two one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Liu J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 9056588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian modeling of multivariate average bioequivalence.
    Ghosh P; Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2402-19. PubMed ID: 18095275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for the evaluation of individual bioequivalence.
    Endrenyi L
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Sep; 32(9):497-508. PubMed ID: 7820334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Truncated AUC evaluates effectively the bioequivalence of drugs with long half-lives.
    Endrenyi L; Tothfalusi L
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Apr; 35(4):142-50. PubMed ID: 9112134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.
    Hauck WW; Anderson S
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992 May; 30(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 1592546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioavailability of two oral-tablet and two oral-suspension formulations of naproxen sodium/paracetamol (acetaminophen): single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover comparisons in healthy Mexican adult subjects.
    Palma-Aguirre JA; Villalpando-Hernández J; Novoa-Heckel G; Oliva I; Cariño L; López-Bojórquez E; Burke-Fraga V; Namur S; González-de la Parra M
    Clin Ther; 2009 Feb; 31(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 19302912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size determination: extended tables for the multiplicative model and bioequivalence ranges of 0.9 to 1.11 and 0.7 to 1.43.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S59-62. PubMed ID: 1601533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The assessment of individual and population bioequivalence.
    Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Mar; 6(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 8838775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.