These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18447070)

  • 1. The influence of group discussion on performance judgments: rating accuracy, contrast effects, and halo.
    Palmer JK; Loveland JM
    J Psychol; 2008 Mar; 142(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 18447070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.
    Ng KY; Koh C; Ang S; Kennedy JC; Chan KY
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):1033-44. PubMed ID: 21480684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
    Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of raters' and ratees' preferences in process and feedback in performance appraisal.
    Manshor AT; Kamalanabhan TJ
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):203-14. PubMed ID: 10778271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source-monitoring training: toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral measurement.
    Martell RF; Evans DP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):956-63. PubMed ID: 16162067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining contrast effects in performance appraisals: using appropriate controls and assessing accuracy.
    Becker GA; Miller CE
    J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 136(6):667-83. PubMed ID: 12523454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing the performance-cue bias in work behavior ratings: can groups help?
    Martell RF; Leavitt KN
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1032-41. PubMed ID: 12558211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings.
    Baltes BB; Parker CP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):237-267. PubMed ID: 10891297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors.
    Burford B; Illing J; Kergon C; Morrow G; Livingston M
    Med Educ; 2010 Feb; 44(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 20059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation: a perspective from prospect theory.
    Wong KF; Kwong JY
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):284-94. PubMed ID: 15769238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accountability and need for cognition effects on contrast, halo, and accuracy in performance ratings.
    Palmer JK; Feldman JM
    J Psychol; 2005 Mar; 139(2):119-37. PubMed ID: 15844760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value of resident clinical performance ratings.
    Williams RG; Dunnington GL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Oct; 199(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 15454149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of feedback accountability and self-rating information on employee appraisals: a replication and extension.
    Shore TH; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Jun; 100(3 Pt 2):1091-100. PubMed ID: 17886493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual and group modelling of aesthetic judgment strategies.
    Jacobsen T
    Br J Psychol; 2004 Feb; 95(Pt 1):41-56. PubMed ID: 15005867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of sex on raters' accountability.
    Shore TH; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Apr; 92(2):693-702. PubMed ID: 12785662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating frame-of-reference rater training effectiveness using performance schema accuracy.
    Gorman CA; Rentsch JR
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Sep; 94(5):1336-44. PubMed ID: 19702375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of inferential accuracy in performance rating.
    Nathan BR; Alexander RA
    Acad Manage Rev; 1985 Jan; 10(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 10269938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An exploration of "real time" assessments as a means to better understand preceptors' judgments of student performance.
    Luu K; Sidhu R; Chadha NK; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Aug; 28(3):793-809. PubMed ID: 36441287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training.
    Lee C
    Acad Manage Rev; 1985 Apr; 10(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 10271248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A better way to deliver bad news.
    Manzoni JF
    Harv Bus Rev; 2002 Sep; 80(9):114-9, 126. PubMed ID: 12227144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.