183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18447248)
1. Magnet facility credits communication for success.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2008 Mar; 15(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 18447248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guidelines for the organisation of vascular centres in Europe. Part I.
; ; Benedetti-Valentini F; Diamantopoulos E; Antignani PL; Bastounis E; Carpentier P; Fernandes e Fernandes J; Nicolaides A; Bergqvist D; Cairols M; Liapis CD; Nevelsteen A; Van Bockel JH
Int Angiol; 2009 Oct; 28(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 19935587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing provider quality.
Weiss R
Health Prog; 2004; 85(6):54-6. PubMed ID: 15552698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring and benchmarking data. Meeting regulatory goals remains important, but it is no longer a sufficient test of quality performance.
Grant LA; Tellis-Nayak V
Provider; 2004 Oct; 30(10):suppl 4-5. PubMed ID: 15573811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. First rule to improving clinical outcomes--understand how you are measured.
Oliva AF
Physician Exec; 2010; 36(5):46-9. PubMed ID: 20860291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective use of performance indicators.
Lanser EG
Healthc Exec; 2000; 15(5):46-7. PubMed ID: 11183948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction planner. Magnet facility credits communication for success.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2008 Mar; 33(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 18472724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Winning and losing magnet designation.
Goldsmith J
Am J Nurs; 2003 May; 103(5):25. PubMed ID: 12762318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmarking project spurs better guideline adherence.
Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Feb; 9(2):20-1, 13. PubMed ID: 15816311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dashboards and KPIs.
Hellman P; Katz SS
Provider; 2010 Apr; 36(4):45, 47. PubMed ID: 20411795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
Giraldes Mdo R
Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Balancing the health care scorecard.
Shutt JA
Manag Care; 2003 Sep; 12(9):42-6. PubMed ID: 14528673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Every insurer is capable of delivering high quality.
Diamond F
Manag Care; 2009 Feb; 18(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 19264029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking: a compass for change.
Chesney R
Caring; 2008 Sep; 27(9):22-6, 28-9. PubMed ID: 18853914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to measure success of communication.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2011 May; 36(5):52-3. PubMed ID: 21585135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking to high performers drives effective improvement.
Brown P; Golden WE
J Ark Med Soc; 2008 Feb; 104(8):179-80. PubMed ID: 18293840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance measures depend on effective use of good data.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Jan; 26(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15819164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Data interpretation hinges on the rationale for benchmarking project.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2003 Dec; 10(12):133-6. PubMed ID: 14682088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional benchmarks show how you stack up.
Healthc Benchmarks; 2000 Apr; 7(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 11009762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Data-driven scorecard breathes life into strategic plans.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2000 May; 4(5):65-70. PubMed ID: 11183051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
