474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18448302)
1. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: Transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher MJ; Kramer J; Aigner N; Hofmann S; Materka A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 16215966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benign/malignant classifier of soft tissue tumors using MR imaging.
García-Gómez JM; Vidal C; Martí-Bonmatí L; Galant J; Sans N; Robles M; Casacuberta F
MAGMA; 2004 Mar; 16(4):194-201. PubMed ID: 14999563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI of soft-tissue tumors: fast STIR sequence as substitute for T1-weighted fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequence.
Tokuda O; Harada Y; Matsunaga N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1607-14. PubMed ID: 19933655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification.
Collewet G; Strzelecki M; Mariette F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 22(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 14972397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses.
Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A wavelet-based optimal texture feature set for classification of brain tumours.
Sasikala M; Kumaravel N
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 18432467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Texture-Based Analysis of 100 MR Examinations of Head and Neck Tumors - Is It Possible to Discriminate Between Benign and Malignant Masses in a Multicenter Trial?
Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Hesselink JR; Mafee MF; Holzer-Fruehwald L; Czerny C; Mayerhoefer ME
Rofo; 2016 Feb; 188(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 26422418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A computer-aided diagnostic system to discriminate SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance hepatocellular carcinoma by a neural network classifier.
Guo D; Qiu T; Bian J; Kang W; Zhang L
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Dec; 33(8):588-92. PubMed ID: 19656655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The identification of the criteria of malignancy and the tissue characterization of expansive processes in periskeletal soft tissues. The current role of magnetic resonance].
Cappabianca S; De Luca AM; Iscaro FM; Sirignano C; Cantarella R; Del Vecchio W; Grassi R
Radiol Med; 1999 Sep; 98(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 10575440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized characterization of prostate cancer by fractal analysis in MR images.
Lv D; Guo X; Wang X; Zhang J; Fang J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 19557732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions.
Moulton JS; Blebea JS; Dunco DM; Braley SE; Bisset GS; Emery KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1191-9. PubMed ID: 7717231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of texture-based classification of different types of ascites on magnetic resonance.
Stefan PA; Puscas ME; Csuak C; Lebovici A; Petresc B; Lupean R; Mihu CM
J BUON; 2020; 25(2):1237-1244. PubMed ID: 32521931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging differentiation of soft-tissue hemangiomas from malignant soft-tissue masses.
Teo EL; Strouse PJ; Hernandez RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1623-8. PubMed ID: 10845496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
