332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18448437)
1. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Present state and future of flat panel detector in Japan].
Higashida Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 12766266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increases in patient doses need to be avoided when upgrading interventional cardiology systems to flat detectors.
Prieto C; Vano E; Fernández JM; Martínez D; Sánchez R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):83-5. PubMed ID: 21733865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Flat Panel Detector Philips introduced and its system direction].
Yamada S
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 12766268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
Dimov A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: revolution or evolution-what are the issues?
Holmes DR; Laskey WK; Wondrow MA; Cusma JT
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Nov; 63(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 15505837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology.
Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action.
Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
