These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18448712)

  • 1. The Ashley treatment: a step too far, or not far enough?
    Edwards SD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 May; 34(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 18448712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agency, duties and the "Ashley treatment".
    Tan N; Brassington I
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Nov; 35(11):658-61. PubMed ID: 19880700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The case: the "Ashley Treatment" revisited. Commentary: Calibrating the moral compass.
    Holzman IR
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Jul; 19(3):411-3. PubMed ID: 20507689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
    Diekema DS; Fost N
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 20077335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Ashley Treatment: furthering the anthropology of/on disability.
    Battles HT; Manderson L
    Med Anthropol; 2008; 27(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 18663638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The case: the "Ashley Treatment" revisited. Commentary: Who should take on the responsibility of decision making?
    Athanassoulis N
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Jul; 19(3):413-5. PubMed ID: 20507690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ashley's case: the ethics of arresting the growth of children with serious disability.
    Stein GL
    J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 20730670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ashley X.
    Kirschner KL; Brashler R; Savage TA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 86(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18090444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the legal standards that govern requests to sterilize profoundly incompetent children: in light of the "Ashley Treatment," is a new standard appropriate?
    Ryan C
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Oct; 77(1):287-326. PubMed ID: 18985934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The case: the "Ashley Treatment" revisited. Commentary: Weighing the balance.
    Goldworth A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Jul; 19(3):415-6. PubMed ID: 20507691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The case: the "Ashley Treatment" revisited. Commentary: What kind of fire or whose feet?
    Paris JJ; Moore MP
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Jul; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 20507688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parental reasoning about growth attenuation therapy: report of a single-case study.
    Kerruish N; McMillan JR
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 25858291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ethics in anorexia nervosa: autonomy, beneficence or responsibility?].
    Figueroa G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):659-65. PubMed ID: 18769816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ashley revisited: a response to the peer commentaries.
    Diekema DS; Fost N
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20077323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forever a child: analysis of the Ashley case.
    Terry L; Campbell A
    Paediatr Nurs; 2008 Mar; 20(2):21-5. PubMed ID: 18350858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuating growth in children with profound developmental disability: a new approach to an old dilemma.
    Gunther DF; Diekema DS
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2006 Oct; 160(10):1013-7. PubMed ID: 17018459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Ashley Treatment: best interests, convenience, and parental decision-making.
    Liao SM; Savulescu J; Sheehan M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 17474341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What role should moral intuitions play when dealing with children?
    Hester DM
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):56. PubMed ID: 20077342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Depolarizing and complicating the ethics of treatment decision making in brain injury: a disability rights response to Nelson and Frader.
    Gill CJ
    J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):277-88; discussion 289-91. PubMed ID: 15830556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ashley Treatment: Improving Quality of Life or Infringing Dignity and Rights?
    Harnacke C
    Bioethics; 2016 Mar; 30(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 26892712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.