These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18448724)

  • 1. Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5.
    Arshad A; Arkwright PD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 May; 34(5):393-5. PubMed ID: 18448724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
    Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
    Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review: empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an Ethics Committee in Thailand.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limphattharacharoen C; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Pengsaa K; Wilairatana P; Kaewkungwal J
    Malar J; 2015 Sep; 14():342. PubMed ID: 26370243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
    Beyleveld D
    Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
    Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives.
    Cox S; Solbakk JH; Bernabe RDLC
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2022 Nov; 38(11):1897-1907. PubMed ID: 35993742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC.
    Hunter DL
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 18974417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reflections on running training workshops for research ethics committee members in Spain between 2001 and 2008.
    Baños JE; Lucena MI; Serés E; Bosch F
    Croat Med J; 2010 Dec; 51(6):552-9. PubMed ID: 21162168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of funding on biomedical research: a retrospective cohort study.
    Decullier E; Chapuis F
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Jun; 6():165. PubMed ID: 16792794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
    Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Ethics approval for a research study (2).
    Mallia P
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Sep; 124():49-51. PubMed ID: 29731261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
    O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
    Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region.
    Kirigia JM; Wambebe C; Baba-Moussa A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 6():E10. PubMed ID: 16242014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paper use in research ethics applications and study conduct.
    Chakladar A; Eckstein S; White SM
    Clin Med (Lond); 2011 Feb; 11(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21404784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt.
    Sleem H; El-Kamary SS; Silverman HJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2010 Jun; 11():12. PubMed ID: 20584332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results.
    Pich J; Carné X; Arnaiz JA; Gómez B; Trilla A; Rodés J
    Lancet; 2003 Mar; 361(9362):1015-6. PubMed ID: 12660062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?
    Begum R; Kolstoe S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 16():51. PubMed ID: 26206479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug development: assessment of pharmacogenetic studies by Spanish research ethics committees.
    Dal-Ré R; Luque I; Torres R; Lahuerta J
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2009 Apr; 9(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 19079365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.