396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18448984)
1. Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations.
Estes C; Rhee P; Shrader MW; Csavina K; Jacofsky MC; Jacofsky DJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 18448984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric model.
Dougherty PJ; Kim DG; Meisterling S; Wybo C; Yeni Y
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 18594304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Doornink J; Fitzpatrick DC; Boldhaus S; Madey SM; Bottlang M
J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: how does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation?
Higgins TF; Klatt J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 May; 21(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 17485994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?
Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical stability of different fixation constructs for ORIF of radial neck fractures.
Capo JT; Svach D; Ahsgar J; Orillaza NS; Sabatino CT
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.
Fulkerson E; Egol KA; Kubiak EN; Liporace F; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
J Trauma; 2006 Apr; 60(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16612304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of "hybrid" plate constructs in osteoporotic bone?
Freeman AL; Tornetta P; Schmidt A; Bechtold J; Ricci W; Fleming M
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Mar; 24(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20182252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model.
Roberts JW; Grindel SI; Rebholz B; Wang M
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):971-5. PubMed ID: 17826548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.
Seide K; Triebe J; Faschingbauer M; Schulz AP; Püschel K; Mehrtens G; Jürgens Ch
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17134800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture: do screw quantity and locked, interlocking screws make a difference?
Freeman AL; Craig MR; Schmidt AH
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jun; 25(6):333-9. PubMed ID: 21577068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stabilization of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a mechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking single and dual plating methods.
Yoo BJ; Beingessner DM; Barei DP
J Trauma; 2010 Jul; 69(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 20622588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volar fixation for dorsally angulated extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a biomechanical study.
Koh S; Morris RP; Patterson RM; Kearney JP; Buford WL; Viegas SF
J Hand Surg Am; 2006; 31(5):771-9. PubMed ID: 16713841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
