247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18448987)
1. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures.
Arnander MW; Reeves A; MacLeod IA; Pinto TM; Khaleel A
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 18448987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
Tejwani NC; Murthy A; Park J; McLaurin TM; Egol KA; Kummer FJ
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study.
Jacobson SR; Glisson RR; Urbaniak JR
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 9434244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study.
Koonce RC; Baldini TH; Morgan SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):697-701. PubMed ID: 22538250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double plate osteosynthesis provides better biomechanical stabilization than double tension band technique in distal humerus fractures.
Doğramaci Y; Esen E; Kürklü M; Kirici Y; Atahan AO; Kömürcü M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2010 Apr; 21(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 20302560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical characteristics of locking and compression plate constructs applied dorsally to distal radius fractures.
Boswell S; McIff TE; Trease CA; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17481999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs.
Kollias CM; Darcy SP; Reed JG; Rosvold JM; Shrive NG; Hildebrand KA
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Sep; 39(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 21290022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of three models of extra-articular distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis using the finite element method on an osteoporotic computational model.
Sabalic S; Kodvanj J; Pavic A
Injury; 2013 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():S56-61. PubMed ID: 24060021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel Plating of Simulated Distal Humerus Fractures Demonstrates Increased Stiffness Relative to Orthogonal Plating With a Distal Humerus Locking Plate System.
Taylor PA; Owen JR; Benfield CP; Wayne JS; Boardman ND
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Apr; 30(4):e118-22. PubMed ID: 26529123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus.
Schemitsch EH; Tencer AF; Henley MB
J Orthop Trauma; 1994 Dec; 8(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 7869160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volar versus dorsal locking plates with and without radial styloid locking plates for the fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: A biomechanical study in cadavers.
Blythe M; Stoffel K; Jarrett P; Kuster M
J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Dec; 31(10):1587-93. PubMed ID: 17145377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of a 2 and 3 proximal screw-configured antegrade piriformis intramedullary nail with a trochanteric reconstruction nail in an unstable subtrochanteric fracture model.
Fissel B; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 18448988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
