886 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18449030)
1. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Hu Y; Ding Y; Ruan D; Wong YW; Cheung KM; Luk KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):E305-10. PubMed ID: 18449030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of somatosensory evoked potentials in diagnosis, surgical monitoring and prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Ding Y; Hu Y; Ruan DK; Chen B
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1374-8. PubMed ID: 18959112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Suda K; Abumi K; Ito M; Shono Y; Kaneda K; Fujiya M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1258-62. PubMed ID: 12811268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Wang LF; Ding WY; Xu JX; He J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E396-9. PubMed ID: 20393392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement.
Singh A; Crockard HA
J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):798-818. PubMed ID: 16320550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment.
Sumi M; Miyamoto H; Suzuki T; Kaneyama S; Kanatani T; Uno K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21981274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion.
Chagas H; Domingues F; Aversa A; Vidal Fonseca AL; de Souza JM
Surg Neurol; 2005; 64 Suppl 1():S1:30-5; discussion S1:35-6. PubMed ID: 15967227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study.
Kadanka Z; Mares M; Bednaník J; Smrcka V; Krbec M; Stejskal L; Chaloupka R; Surelová D; Novotný O; Urbánek I; Dusek L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(20):2205-10; discussion 2210-1. PubMed ID: 12394893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: utility of the onset-latency parameters.
Nakai S; Sonoo M; Shimizu T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2396-404. PubMed ID: 18762446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Restuccia D; Di Lazzaro V; Lo Monaco M; Evoli A; Valeriani M; Tonali P
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 32(7-8):389-95. PubMed ID: 1526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Correlations between clinical course and investigation results of central conduction time of somatosensory potentials evoked from tibial nerves in patients with cervical myelopathy treated by surgery].
Lyczak P; Zabielski W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Aug; 19(110):162-5. PubMed ID: 16245423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically.
Latimer M; Haden N; Seeley HM; Laing RJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 16(6):545-9. PubMed ID: 12617234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Avadhani A; Rajasekaran S; Shetty AP
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the long-term outcome of anterior approach surgery on cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
Lu KW; Jin DD; Wang J; Chen JT; Wang JX; Jiang JM; Qu DB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1091-3. PubMed ID: 17081461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Somatosensory evoked potentials in evaluation of decompressive surgery of cervical spondylosis and herniated disc.
Heiskari M; Siivola J; Heikkinen ER
Ann Clin Res; 1986; 18 Suppl 47():107-13. PubMed ID: 3813464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cervical myelopathy using transcranial magnetic stimulation and prediction of prognosis after laminoplasty.
Takahashi J; Hirabayashi H; Hashidate H; Ogihara N; Yamazaki I; Kamimura M; Ebara S; Kato H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E15-20. PubMed ID: 18165736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.
Yukawa Y; Kato F; Ito K; Horie Y; Hida T; Ito Z; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1980-5. PubMed ID: 17700444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.
Shiraishi T; Fukuda K; Yato Y; Nakamura M; Ikegami T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective laminoplasty after the preoperative diagnosis of the responsible level using spinal cord evoked potentials in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary report.
Kato Y; Kojima T; Kataoka H; Imajo Y; Yara T; Yoshida Y; Imagama T; Taguchi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):586-92. PubMed ID: 19956033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
