BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18449158)

  • 61. MLC dosimetric characteristics for small field and IMRT applications.
    Bayouth JE; Morrill SM
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2545-52. PubMed ID: 14528977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Dosimetric characterization of a multileaf collimator].
    Stasi M; Baiotto B; Palamara F; Gabriele P; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 10432971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. MLC parameters from static fields to VMAT plans: an evaluation in a RT-dedicated MC environment (PRIMO).
    Paganini L; Reggiori G; Stravato A; Palumbo V; Mancosu P; Lobefalo F; Gaudino A; Fogliata A; Scorsetti M; Tomatis S
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):216. PubMed ID: 31791355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Experimental determination of peripheral doses for different IMRT techniques delivered by a Siemens linear accelerator.
    Wiezorek T; Voigt A; Metzger N; Georg D; Schwedas M; Salz H; Wendt TG
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 18259698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Monte Carlo implementation, validation, and characterization of a 120 leaf MLC.
    Fix MK; Volken W; Frei D; Frauchiger D; Born EJ; Manser P
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5311-20. PubMed ID: 21992349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Experimental investigation of the response of an amorphous silicon EPID to intensity modulated radiotherapy beams.
    Greer PB; Vial P; Oliver L; Baldock C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4389-98. PubMed ID: 18072504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Multileaf collimator end leaf leakage: implications for wide-field IMRT.
    Hardcastle N; Metcalfe P; Ceylan A; Williams MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):N493-504. PubMed ID: 17951847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
    Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The sliding slit test for dynamic IMRT: a useful tool for adjustment of MLC related parameters.
    Chauvet I; Petitfils A; Lehobey C; Kristner JY; Brunet Y; Lembrez R; Gaboriaud G; Mazal A; Zefkili S; Rosenwald JC
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(4):563-80. PubMed ID: 15773620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Monte Carlo modeling and simulations of the High Definition (HD120) micro MLC and validation against measurements for a 6 MV beam.
    Borges C; Zarza-Moreno M; Heath E; Teixeira N; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):415-23. PubMed ID: 22225311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
    Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Verification of dosimetric accuracy on the TrueBeam STx: rounded leaf effect of the high definition MLC.
    Kielar KN; Mok E; Hsu A; Wang L; Luxton G
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6360-71. PubMed ID: 23039672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
    George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparing dose in the build-up region between compensator- and MLC-based IMRT.
    Javedan K; Zhang GG; Hoffe S; Feygelman V; Forster K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3748. PubMed ID: 22955641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
    Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Output ratio in air for MLC shaped irregular fields.
    Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE; Xiao Y; Bieda M
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2480-90. PubMed ID: 15487728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
    Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Reducing the number of monitor units in multileaf collimator field segmentation.
    Kalinowski T
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1147-61. PubMed ID: 15798314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system.
    Cadman P; Bassalow R; Sidhu NP; Ibbott G; Nelson A
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):3001-10. PubMed ID: 12222862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Dosimetric impact of geometric errors due to respiratory motion prediction on dynamic multileaf collimator-based four-dimensional radiation delivery.
    Vedam S; Docef A; Fix M; Murphy M; Keall P
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1607-20. PubMed ID: 16013720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.