BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18450004)

  • 1. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New horizons in mouse immunoinformatics: reliable in silico prediction of mouse class I histocompatibility major complex peptide binding affinity.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Guan P; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3274-83. PubMed ID: 15534705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico prediction of peptide binding affinity to class I mouse major histocompatibility complexes: a comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) study.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 16180918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward prediction of class II mouse major histocompatibility complex peptide binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic evaluation using partial least squares, a robust multivariate statistical technique.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Toseland CP; Guan P; Taylor DJ; Hemsley SL; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1491-502. PubMed ID: 16711768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static energy analysis of MHC class I and class II peptide-binding affinity.
    Davies MN; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():309-20. PubMed ID: 18450011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In silico prediction of peptide-MHC binding affinity using SVRMHC.
    Liu W; Wan J; Meng X; Flower DR; Li T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():283-91. PubMed ID: 18450008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative online prediction of peptide binding to the major histocompatibility complex.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Guan P; Doytchinova IA; Zygouri C; Flower DR
    J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Jan; 22(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 14629978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A practical guide to structure-based prediction of MHC-binding peptides.
    Ranganathan S; Tong JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():301-8. PubMed ID: 18450010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the prediction of MHC supermotifs.
    Doytchinova IA; Guan P; Flower DR
    Methods; 2004 Dec; 34(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 15542370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards the in silico identification of class II restricted T-cell epitopes: a partial least squares iterative self-consistent algorithm for affinity prediction.
    Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(17):2263-70. PubMed ID: 14630655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational vaccinology: quantitative approaches.
    Flower DR; McSparron H; Blythe MJ; Zygouri C; Taylor D; Guan P; Wan S; Coveney PV; Walshe V; Borrow P; Doytchinova IA
    Novartis Found Symp; 2003; 254():102-20; discussion 120-5, 216-22, 250-2. PubMed ID: 14712934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the MHC-peptide affinity using some interactive-type molecular descriptors and QSAR models.
    Lin TH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():247-60. PubMed ID: 18450005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EpiTOP--a proteochemometric tool for MHC class II binding prediction.
    Dimitrov I; Garnev P; Flower DR; Doytchinova I
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 26(16):2066-8. PubMed ID: 20576624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binders using multivariate statistics: comparison of discriminant analysis and multiple linear regression.
    Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):234-8. PubMed ID: 17238269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural prediction of peptides binding to MHC class I molecules.
    Bui HH; Schiewe AJ; von Grafenstein H; Haworth IS
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 16447245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An iterative approach to class II predictions.
    Mallios RR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():341-53. PubMed ID: 18450013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BiodMHC: an online server for the prediction of MHC class II-peptide binding affinity.
    Wang L; Pan D; Hu X; Xiao J; Gao Y; Zhang H; Zhang Y; Liu J; Zhu S
    J Genet Genomics; 2009 May; 36(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 19447377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating in silico and in vitro analysis of peptide binding affinity to HLA-Cw*0102: a bioinformatic approach to the prediction of new epitopes.
    Walshe VA; Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Wong M; Macdonald IK; Mulder A; Claas FH; Pellegrino P; Turner J; Williams I; Turnbull EL; Borrow P; Flower DR
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e8095. PubMed ID: 19956609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II HLA-peptide binding prediction using structural principles.
    Mohanapriya A; Lulu S; Kayathri R; Kangueane P
    Hum Immunol; 2009 Mar; 70(3):159-69. PubMed ID: 19187794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: QSAR studies on peptides having affinity with the class I MHC molecular HLA-A*0201.
    Zhihua L; Yuzhang W; Bo Z; Bing N; Li W
    J Comput Biol; 2004; 11(4):683-94. PubMed ID: 15579238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.