These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18450012)

  • 1. Molecular dynamics simulations: bring biomolecular structures alive on a computer.
    Wan S; Coveney PV; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():321-39. PubMed ID: 18450012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular modeling of an antigenic complex between a viral peptide and a class I major histocompatibility glycoprotein.
    Rognan D; Reddehase MJ; Koszinowski UH; Folkers G
    Proteins; 1992 May; 13(1):70-85. PubMed ID: 1594579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward the atomistic simulation of T cell epitopes automated construction of MHC: peptide structures for free energy calculations.
    Todman SJ; Halling-Brown MD; Davies MN; Flower DR; Kayikci M; Moss DS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Feb; 26(6):957-61. PubMed ID: 17766153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static energy analysis of MHC class I and class II peptide-binding affinity.
    Davies MN; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():309-20. PubMed ID: 18450011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A practical guide to structure-based prediction of MHC-binding peptides.
    Ranganathan S; Tong JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():301-8. PubMed ID: 18450010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HistoCheck. Evaluating structural and functional MHC similarities.
    DeLuca DS; Blasczyk R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():395-405. PubMed ID: 18450018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of solvation sites at the interface of Src SH2 domain complexes using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Geroult S; Hooda M; Virdee S; Waksman G
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Aug; 70(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 17683370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frontiers in molecular dynamics simulations of DNA.
    Pérez A; Luque FJ; Orozco M
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Feb; 45(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21830782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials.
    Hassan SA; Mehler EL; Zhang D; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 12596268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Force-field development and molecular dynamics simulations of ferrocene-peptide conjugates as a scaffold for hydrogenase mimics.
    de Hatten X; Cournia Z; Huc I; Smith JC; Metzler-Nolte N
    Chemistry; 2007; 13(29):8139-52. PubMed ID: 17763506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating receptor flexibility in the molecular design of protein interfaces.
    Li L; Liang S; Pilcher MM; Meroueh SO
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):575-86. PubMed ID: 19643976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How T cell receptors interact with peptide-MHCs: a multiple steered molecular dynamics study.
    Cuendet MA; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2011 Nov; 79(11):3007-24. PubMed ID: 21989928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A GRID-derived water network stabilizes molecular dynamics computer simulations of a protease.
    Wallnoefer HG; Liedl KR; Fox T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2860-7. PubMed ID: 21970362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular dynamics simulations of B '-DNA: sequence effects on A-tract-induced bending and flexibility.
    McConnell KJ; Beveridge DL
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Nov; 314(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 11724529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated annealing coupled replica exchange molecular dynamics--an efficient conformational sampling method.
    Kannan S; Zacharias M
    J Struct Biol; 2009 Jun; 166(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 19272454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the MHC-peptide affinity using some interactive-type molecular descriptors and QSAR models.
    Lin TH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():247-60. PubMed ID: 18450005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binding of antifusion peptides with HIVgp41 from molecular dynamics simulations: quantitative correlation with experiment.
    Strockbine B; Rizzo RC
    Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):630-42. PubMed ID: 17335007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An iterative approach to class II predictions.
    Mallios RR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():341-53. PubMed ID: 18450013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexibility of the MHC class II peptide binding cleft in the bound, partially filled, and empty states: a molecular dynamics simulation study.
    Yaneva R; Springer S; Zacharias M
    Biopolymers; 2009 Jan; 91(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 18767126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.