These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18450046)

  • 1. Statistical inference on categorical variables.
    Perkins SM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():73-88. PubMed ID: 18450046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Characteristics of categorical data analysis].
    Zuvić-Butorac M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():63-79. PubMed ID: 16526308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of mixed categorical data in 2 x K contingency tables.
    Gautam S
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1471-84. PubMed ID: 12185897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing specific hypotheses by fitting underlying distributions to categorical data.
    Johnson WD; Elston RC; Wickremasinghe AR
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 8019584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling and inference for an ordinal effect size measure.
    Ryu E; Agresti A
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1703-17. PubMed ID: 17918752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basic principles of statistical inference.
    Tu W
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():53-72. PubMed ID: 18450045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Types of variables and distributions].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():17-35. PubMed ID: 16526305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is modelling dental caries a 'normal' thing to do?
    Lewsey JD; Gilthorpe MS; Bulman JS; Bedi R
    Community Dent Health; 2000 Dec; 17(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11191194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comments on 'Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2x2 contingency tables', by S.-H. Kang and C. W. Ahn, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:2524-2535.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 19125396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous testing strategy for comparing two treatments in a stratified binomial trial.
    Railkar RA; Mehrotra DV; Iglewicz B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Aug; 10(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 10959915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval estimation of binomial proportion in clinical trials with a two-stage design.
    Tsai WY; Chi Y; Chen CM
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 17566141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blinded sample size reestimation with count data: methods and applications in multiple sclerosis.
    Friede T; Schmidli H
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(10):1145-56. PubMed ID: 20146203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical Inference (part II): The Normal and Related Distributions.
    Lopes AA
    Braz J Infect Dis; 1998 Aug; 2(4):170-174. PubMed ID: 11103005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New method to estimate the sample size for calculation of a proportion assuming binomial distribution.
    Vallejo A; Muniesa A; Ferreira C; de Blas I
    Res Vet Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 23623739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):107-33. PubMed ID: 7952428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution of odds ratio in 2 × 2 contingency table: adjustment for correlation.
    Biswas A; Hwang JS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 21191860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical inference involving binomial and negative binomial parameters.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):288-307. PubMed ID: 19476241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.