These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18450583)

  • 1. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.
    Kirby AE; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):531-42. PubMed ID: 19923242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Kirby AE; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 21969022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):452-68. PubMed ID: 15296005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.
    Schoenecker MC; Bonham BH; Stakhovskaya OA; Snyder RL; Leake PA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):655-72. PubMed ID: 22722899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
    Arslan NO; Luo X
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 450():109075. PubMed ID: 38986164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain.
    Quass GL; Kral A
    Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 443():108953. PubMed ID: 38277881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.