These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18450623)
1. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. Karachalios T; Giotikas D; Roidis N; Poultsides L; Bargiotas K; Malizos KN J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 May; 90(5):584-91. PubMed ID: 18450623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the mini-midvastus with the mini-medial parapatellar approach in primary TKA. Li XG; Tang TS; Qian ZL; Huang LX; Pan WM; Zhu RF Orthopedics; 2010 Oct; 33(10):723. PubMed ID: 20954671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Mini-Midvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. Verburg H; Mathijssen NM; Niesten DD; Verhaar JA; Pilot P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jun; 98(12):1014-22. PubMed ID: 27307362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Nestor BJ; Toulson CE; Backus SI; Lyman SL; Foote KL; Windsor RE J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):5-11, 11.e1. PubMed ID: 20541889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Guy SP; Farndon MA; Conroy JL; Bennett C; Grainger AJ; London NJ Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):866-71. PubMed ID: 22608852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Pan WM; Li XG; Tang TS; Qian ZL; Zhang Q; Zhang CM J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(3):890-900. PubMed ID: 20819425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Juosponis R; Tarasevicius S; Smailys A; Kalesinskas RJ Int Orthop; 2009 Oct; 33(5):1233-7. PubMed ID: 18654774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total knee arthroplasty performed with either a mini-subvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomized controlled study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Lai Z; Shi S; Fei J; Wei W Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1155-62. PubMed ID: 24595613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Bonutti PM; Zywiel MG; Ulrich SD; Stroh DA; Seyler TM; Mont MA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):575-82. PubMed ID: 20194315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Zhang Z; Zhu W; Gu B; Zhu L; Chen C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Mar; 133(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 23229457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release of stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty. Zhang Y; Ye LY; Liu HX; Wen H J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jul; 20(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 25963610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. Nutton RW; van der Linden ML; Rowe PJ; Gaston P; Wade FA J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18160497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between minimally invasive lateral approach and mini-midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Siramanakul C; Sriphirom P J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Oct; 95 Suppl 10():S53-7. PubMed ID: 23451439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total knee arthroplasty with application of anatomic endoprosthesis journey. Clinical and radiological assessment in a 2-year follow-up. Dutka J; Sorysz T; Dobosz B; Skowronek M Pol Orthop Traumatol; 2012 Mar; 77():1-4. PubMed ID: 23306278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. Pandit H; Jenkins C; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16365121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: outcomes pendulum is at equilibrium. Heekin RD; Fokin AA J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 23790343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty]. Shi MG; Lü HS; Guan ZP Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1101-5. PubMed ID: 17081464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Surgical technique and clinical results of total knee arthroplasty in treating endstage gonarthrosis combined with valgus knee deformity]. Wang X; Weng X; Lin J; Jin J; Qian W Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 22702039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does a mobile-bearing, high-flexion design increase knee flexion after total knee replacement? Nutton RW; Wade FA; Coutts FJ; van der Linden ML J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1051-7. PubMed ID: 22844045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of factors relating to clinical outcomes after total knee replacement]. Yuan A; Cai D; Wang K Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 21(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 17419199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]