These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18451428)

  • 1. Graphical models of residue coupling in protein families.
    Thomas J; Ramakrishnan N; Bailey-Kellogg C
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 18451428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein design by sampling an undirected graphical model of residue constraints.
    Thomas J; Ramakrishnan N; Bailey-Kellogg C
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 19644177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graphical models of protein-protein interaction specificity from correlated mutations and interaction data.
    Thomas J; Ramakrishnan N; Bailey-Kellogg C
    Proteins; 2009 Sep; 76(4):911-29. PubMed ID: 19306342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning generative models for protein fold families.
    Balakrishnan S; Kamisetty H; Carbonell JG; Lee SI; Langmead CJ
    Proteins; 2011 Apr; 79(4):1061-78. PubMed ID: 21268112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical analysis and prediction of functional residues effective for GPCR-G-protein coupling selectivity.
    Muramatsu T; Suwa M
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Jun; 19(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 16565146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors.
    Huang ES
    Protein Sci; 2003 Jul; 12(7):1360-7. PubMed ID: 12824482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of sequence covariation methods to mine evolutionary hubs: examples from selected GPCR families.
    Pelé J; Moreau M; Abdi H; Rodien P; Castel H; Chabbert M
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):2141-56. PubMed ID: 24677372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of protein structural class with Rough Sets.
    Cao Y; Liu S; Zhang L; Qin J; Wang J; Tang K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():20. PubMed ID: 16412240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced alphabet motif methodology for GPCR annotation.
    Gangal R; Kumar KK
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2007 Dec; 25(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 17937491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boosting classifier for predicting protein domain structural class.
    Feng KY; Cai YD; Chou KC
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2005 Aug; 334(1):213-7. PubMed ID: 15993842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DINAMO: a coupled sequence alignment editor/molecular graphics tool for interactive homology modeling of proteins.
    Hansen M; Bentz J; Baucom A; Gregoret L
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1998; ():106-17. PubMed ID: 9697175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretable numerical descriptors of amino acid space.
    Georgiev AG
    J Comput Biol; 2009 May; 16(5):703-23. PubMed ID: 19432540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amino acid recognition by Venus flytrap domains is encoded in an 8-residue motif.
    Acher FC; Bertrand HO
    Biopolymers; 2005; 80(2-3):357-66. PubMed ID: 15810013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of class A and D G protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation.
    Eilers M; Hornak V; Smith SO; Konopka JB
    Biochemistry; 2005 Jun; 44(25):8959-75. PubMed ID: 15966721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein secondary structure prediction with SPARROW.
    Bettella F; Rasinski D; Knapp EW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):545-56. PubMed ID: 22224407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of functional specificity determinants from protein sequences using log-likelihood ratios.
    Pei J; Cai W; Kinch LN; Grishin NV
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16278237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning sequence determinants of protein:protein interaction specificity with sparse graphical models.
    Kamisetty H; Ghosh B; Langmead CJ; Bailey-Kellogg C
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):474-86. PubMed ID: 25973864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification of G proteins and prediction of GPCRs-G proteins coupling specificity using continuous wavelet transform and information theory.
    Li Z; Zhou X; Dai Z; Zou X
    Amino Acids; 2012 Aug; 43(2):793-804. PubMed ID: 22086210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct coupling analysis for protein contact prediction.
    Morcos F; Hwa T; Onuchic JN; Weigt M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1137():55-70. PubMed ID: 24573474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.