These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18451749)

  • 1. Comment by reviewer re: "The impact of cochlear implants from the perspective of significant others of adult cochlear implant users".
    Berliner KI
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):735; discussion 734. PubMed ID: 18451749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of cochlear implants from the perspective of significant others of adult cochlear implant users.
    Kennedy V; Stephens D; Fitzmaurice P
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 18401287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 May; 59(5):228-34. PubMed ID: 18501158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychological effects of cochlear implant: patient and "index relative" perceptions.
    Wexler M; Miller LW; Berliner KI; Crary WG
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):59-61. PubMed ID: 6805399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clarion cochlear implant: phase I investigational results.
    Pierschalla M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Jul; 15(4):568. PubMed ID: 8588616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting choice of device by cochlear implant candidates.
    Migirov L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Wolf M; Kronenberg J
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):743-6. PubMed ID: 19638937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-esteem and social well-being of children with cochlear implant compared to normal-hearing children.
    Percy-Smith L; Cayé-Thomasen P; Gudman M; Jensen JH; Thomsen J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1113-20. PubMed ID: 18501436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Rehabilitation of deaf children with a cochlear implant].
    Deriaz M
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Sep; 5(219):1933-5. PubMed ID: 19946995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of device failure in more than 23 years of clinical experience of a cochlear implant program with more than 3,400 implantees.
    Battmer RD; Linz B; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 19373120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of fifty-six cochlear implant device failures.
    Gosepath J; Lippert K; Keilmann A; Mann WJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 19372725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tinnitus is prevalent in children with cochlear implants.
    Chadha NK; Gordon KA; James AL; Papsin BC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 May; 73(5):671-5. PubMed ID: 19185357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Chan JC; Freed DJ; Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):296-310. PubMed ID: 18569102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants.
    Ramos A; Rodriguez C; Martinez-Beneyto P; Perez D; Gault A; Falcon JC; Boyle P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 18649152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.