116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18452023)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging.
Achiam MP; Løgager VB; Chabanova E; Eegholm B; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2009 Jul; 34(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 18452023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy.
Achiam MP; Løgager V; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 19041207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager V; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 17019654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR colonography with fecal tagging: do individual patient characteristics influence image quality?
Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Barkhausen J; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 17457810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12066239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Boraschi P; Donati F
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):585-94. PubMed ID: 27209295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Holtmann G; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 11930074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance.
Lauenstein T; Holtmann G; Schoenfelder D; Bosk S; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Oct; 177(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 11566681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.
Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Zoepf T; Nuefer M; Grabellus F; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Gut; 2007 Aug; 56(8):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17341542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance.
Langhorst J; Kühle CA; Ajaj W; Nüfer M; Barkhausen J; Michalsen A; Dobos GJ; Lauenstein TC
Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2007 Aug; 13(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 17352384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravenous, contrast-enhanced MR colonography using air as endoluminal contrast agent: impact on colorectal polyp detection.
Keeling AN; Morrin MM; McKenzie C; Farrell RJ; Sheth SG; Ngo L; Bloch BN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 21131152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies.
Haykir R; Karakose S; Karabacakoglu A; Sahin M; Kayacetin E
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 12(15):2345-50. PubMed ID: 16688823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
