116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18452023)
21. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.
Rodriguez Gomez S; Pagés Llinas M; Castells Garangou A; De Juan Garcia C; Bordas Alsina JM; Rimola Gibert J; Ayuso Colella JR; Ayuso Colella C
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18320195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy.
Saar B; Meining A; Beer A; Settles M; Helmberger H; Frimberger E; Rummeny EJ; Rösch T
Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):235-41. PubMed ID: 17329681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.
Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Zoepf T; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2286-93. PubMed ID: 17522866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dark-lumen MR colonography.
Ajaj W; Debatin JF; Lauenstein T
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 14716455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance colonography with fecal tagging: an innovative approach without bowel cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Debatin JF
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 13(6):435-44. PubMed ID: 12478023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection.
Geenen RW; Hussain SM; Cademartiri F; Poley JW; Siersema PD; Krestin GP
Radiographics; 2004; 24(1):e18. PubMed ID: 14527992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals.
Leung WK; Lam WW; Wu JC; So NM; Fung SS; Chan FK; To KF; Yeung DT; Sung JJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jan; 99(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 14687150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity.
Ajaj WM; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Gerken G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
Gut; 2005 Feb; 54(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 15647191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies.
Florie J; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; Birnie E; Lavini C; Reitsma JB; Stoker J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):766-74. PubMed ID: 17340636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical aspects of MR colonography as a diagnostic tool.
Achiam M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Oct; 57(10):B4195. PubMed ID: 21040690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. MR colonography: current status.
Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1519-26. PubMed ID: 16770654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy.
Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Langhorst J; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 16736477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital subtraction dark-lumen MR colonography: initial experience.
Ajaj W; Veit P; Kuehle C; Joekel M; Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):841-4. PubMed ID: 15906327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
