195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18454000)
1. Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Altug-Atac AT; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1751-1759. PubMed ID: 18454000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction.
Dec W; Peltomaki T; Warren SM; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jun; 121(6):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 18520899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary report.
Kusnoto B; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Nov; 10(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 10726500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial microsomia.
Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Mackool RJ; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(4):985-995. PubMed ID: 16980861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a long-term study.
Chow A; Lee HF; Trahar M; Kawamoto H; Vastardis H; Ting K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):724-31. PubMed ID: 19061798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distraction osteogenesis: its application in severe mandibular deformities in hemifacial microsomia.
Polley JW; Figueroa AA
J Craniofac Surg; 1997 Sep; 8(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 9482086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-year follow-up of distraction osteogenesis: its effect on mandibular ramus height in hemifacial microsomia.
Marquez IM; Fish LC; Stella JP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 10672212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Sant'Anna EF; Lau GW; Marquezan M; de Souza Araújo MT; Polley JW; Figueroa AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):566-77. PubMed ID: 25919102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in width of lower face after unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Tan W; Yu B; Niu F; Gui L
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 22337382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distraction.
Vendittelli BL; Dec W; Warren SM; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Oct; 122(4):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 18827649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral mandibular ramus elongation by intraoral distraction osteogenesis.
Kofod T; Nørholt SE; Pedersen TK; Jensen J
J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 16(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 15750421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ten-year follow-up of a patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with distraction osteogenesis and orthodontics: an implant analysis.
Işeri H; Kişnişci R; Altuğ-Ataç AT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 18675213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with multidirectional extraoral distraction device in hemifacial microsomia patients: three-dimensional treatment planning, prediction tracings, and case outcomes.
Tharanon W; Sinn DP
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 May; 10(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 10530229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a preliminary report.
Trahar M; Sheffield R; Kawamoto H; Lee HF; Ting K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):639-50. PubMed ID: 14666076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia.
Rachmiel A; Manor R; Peled M; Laufer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jul; 59(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 11429728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular distraction in unilateral craniofacial microsomia: longitudinal results until the completion of growth.
Suh J; Choi TH; Baek SH; Kim JC; Kim S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Nov; 132(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 24165605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices: a report of 8 cases.
Rubio-Bueno P; Padrón A; Villa E; Díaz-González FJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 58(6):593-9; discussion 600-1. PubMed ID: 10847278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Curvilinear mandibular distraction results and long-term stability effects in a group of 40 patients.
Aizenbud D; Hazan-Molina H; Thimmappa B; Hopkins EM; Schendel SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 20517103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: long-term follow-up.
Meazzini MC; Mazzoleni F; Gabriele C; Bozzetti A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):370-6. PubMed ID: 16256360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in Soft Tissue Measurements After Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.
Al-Mahdi AH; Al-Hasnawi SN; Al-Jumaily HA
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):e702-e707. PubMed ID: 27564073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
