116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18454109)
21. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Synthesis of genetic association studies for pertinent gene-disease associations requires appropriate methodological and statistical approaches.
Zintzaras E; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 61(7):634-45. PubMed ID: 18538260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
Bonett DG
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Understanding statistical terms. 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Aug; 47(8):95-6. PubMed ID: 19654420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is the statistical difference clinically relevant?
Fridrik MA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8537; author reply 8537-8. PubMed ID: 16293884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.
Cooper H; Patall EA
Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 19485627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
Peters JL; Mengersen KL
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Data exploration in meta-analysis with smooth latent distributions.
Eilers PH
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3358-68. PubMed ID: 17216668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating risk difference from relative association measures in meta-analysis can infrequently pose interpretational challenges.
Murad MH; Montori VM; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):865-7. PubMed ID: 19230610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews.
Sutton AJ; Donegan S; Takwoingi Y; Garner P; Gamble C; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18783919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Statistical analysis in family medicine research.
LeFevre ML
Fam Med; 1988; 20(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 3234651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.
Marret E; Elia N; Dahl JB; McQuay HJ; Møiniche S; Moore RA; Straube S; Tramèr MR
Anesthesiology; 2009 Dec; 111(6):1279-89. PubMed ID: 19934873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
