These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

615 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18454194)

  • 1. Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits.
    Hill WG; Goddard ME; Visscher PM
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Feb; 4(2):e1000008. PubMed ID: 18454194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epistasis Is a Major Determinant of the Additive Genetic Variance in Mimulus guttatus.
    Monnahan PJ; Kelly JK
    PLoS Genet; 2015 May; 11(5):e1005201. PubMed ID: 25946702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models.
    Mäki-Tanila A; Hill WG
    Genetics; 2014 Sep; 198(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 24990992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1627-33. PubMed ID: 12930766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of non-additive genetic interactions on selection in multi-locus genetic models.
    Hallander J; Waldmann P
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 17327874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The additive genetic variance after bottlenecks is affected by the number of loci involved in epistatic interactions.
    Naciri-Graven Y; Goudet J
    Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12778542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions.
    Mackay TF
    Nat Rev Genet; 2014 Jan; 15(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 24296533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dominance Can Increase Genetic Variance After a Population Bottleneck: A Synthesis of the Theoretical and Empirical Evidence.
    Mularo AJ; Bernal XE; DeWoody JA
    J Hered; 2022 Jul; 113(3):257-271. PubMed ID: 35143665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast.
    Forsberg SK; Bloom JS; Sadhu MJ; Kruglyak L; Carlborg Ö
    Nat Genet; 2017 Apr; 49(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 28250458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does epistasis influence the response to selection?
    Barton NH
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Jan; 118(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 27901509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epistasis and the temporal change in the additive variance-covariance matrix induced by drift.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1655-63. PubMed ID: 15446420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heritability of heterozygosity offers a new way of understanding why dominant gene action contributes to additive genetic variance.
    Nietlisbach P; Hadfield JD
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1948-52. PubMed ID: 26100570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of epistasis on the excess of the additive and nonadditive variances after population bottlenecks.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2002 May; 56(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 12093023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; van der Werf JHJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):783-795. PubMed ID: 31857332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast.
    Bloom JS; Kotenko I; Sadhu MJ; Treusch S; Albert FW; Kruglyak L
    Nat Commun; 2015 Nov; 6():8712. PubMed ID: 26537231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?
    Carlborg O; Haley CS
    Nat Rev Genet; 2004 Aug; 5(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 15266344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.