BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18454730)

  • 1. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
    Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
    Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.
    Li SS; Bigler J; Lampe JW; Potter JD; Feng Z
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2267-80. PubMed ID: 15977294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
    Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
    Matsui S; Noma H
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On parametric empirical Bayes methods for comparing multiple groups using replicated gene expression profiles.
    Kendziorski CM; Newton MA; Lan H; Gould MN
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3899-914. PubMed ID: 14673946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
    Zhang S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Chen J; Sarkar SK
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An EM-based semi-parametric mixture model approach to the regression analysis of competing-risks data.
    Ng SK; McLachlan GJ
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1097-111. PubMed ID: 12652556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical bayes gene screening tool for time-course or dose-response microarray data.
    Eckel JE; Gennings C; Chinchilli VM; Burgoon LD; Zacharewski TR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Aug; 14(3):647-70. PubMed ID: 15468757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
    Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
    Yang H; Churchill G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully Bayesian mixture model for differential gene expression: simulations and model checks.
    Lewin A; Bochkina N; Richardson S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article36. PubMed ID: 18171320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical Bayes models for cDNA microarray gene expression.
    Lönnstedt I; Britton T
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 15772106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.