306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18454730)
1. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.
Li SS; Bigler J; Lampe JW; Potter JD; Feng Z
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2267-80. PubMed ID: 15977294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
Matsui S; Noma H
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On parametric empirical Bayes methods for comparing multiple groups using replicated gene expression profiles.
Kendziorski CM; Newton MA; Lan H; Gould MN
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3899-914. PubMed ID: 14673946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
Zhang S
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Chen J; Sarkar SK
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An EM-based semi-parametric mixture model approach to the regression analysis of competing-risks data.
Ng SK; McLachlan GJ
Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1097-111. PubMed ID: 12652556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical bayes gene screening tool for time-course or dose-response microarray data.
Eckel JE; Gennings C; Chinchilli VM; Burgoon LD; Zacharewski TR
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Aug; 14(3):647-70. PubMed ID: 15468757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
Yang H; Churchill G
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully Bayesian mixture model for differential gene expression: simulations and model checks.
Lewin A; Bochkina N; Richardson S
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article36. PubMed ID: 18171320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hierarchical Bayes models for cDNA microarray gene expression.
Lönnstedt I; Britton T
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 15772106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]