These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18455264)

  • 1. Appetite: peer-reviewed research across the disciplines.
    Booth D
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 18455264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review unmasked.
    Brunier G
    J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duplicate publications in peer-reviewed journals.
    Benninger MS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Mar; 126(3):209-10. PubMed ID: 11956526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Peer review].
    Boer EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(49):2455-9. PubMed ID: 2594115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anonymous peer refereeing.
    Nature; 1989 Jan; 337(6204):202. PubMed ID: 2911357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM's "peer review: fair review" section.
    Khan KM; Stovitz SD; Pluim B; Cook JL; Bahr R; Arendt EA; Noakes TD
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 42(2):79. PubMed ID: 18256294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conflict in peer review.
    Lawrence DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):177-8. PubMed ID: 2351879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What's a peer reviewed journal?
    Guerrieri R
    Nurs Manage; 2012 Aug; 43(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 22846700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nothing to hide.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Jun; 8(6):541. PubMed ID: 16738696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducing data.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Jun; 8(6):541. PubMed ID: 16738697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
    Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Pretentious and deified papers].
    Amato Neto V
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2003; 36(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 12806469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Anonymous but irreplaceable experts in scientific journals].
    Kontula K
    Duodecim; 1993; 109(23-24):2181-3. PubMed ID: 7743970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The review process in refereed journals.
    Huntly DE
    Kans Nurse; 1986 Apr; 61(4):7-8, 18. PubMed ID: 3634838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of multi- and inter-disciplinary research--the no-peer problem.
    Elliott JA
    Cryobiology; 2011 Apr; 62(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 21277294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Another year.
    Smith ER
    Can J Cardiol; 2005 Jan; 21(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 15685310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.