These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18455313)

  • 1. The significance of clinical significance.
    Turner JA; Turk DC
    Pain; 2008 Jul; 137(3):467-468. PubMed ID: 18455313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based clinical trial design for chronic pain pharmacotherapy: a blueprint for ACTION.
    Dworkin RH; Turk DC; Katz NP; Rowbotham MC; Peirce-Sandner S; Cerny I; Clingman CS; Eloff BC; Farrar JT; Kamp C; McDermott MP; Rappaport BA; Sanhai WR
    Pain; 2011 Mar; 152(3 Suppl):S107-S115. PubMed ID: 21145657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opportunities and limitations of general practice databases in pain research.
    Jordan KP; Croft P
    Pain; 2008 Jul; 137(3):469-470. PubMed ID: 18485597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do you expect from this treatment? Changing our mind about clinical trials.
    Benedetti F
    Pain; 2007 Apr; 128(3):193-194. PubMed ID: 17292547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cut-points for the measurement of pain: the choice depends on what you want to study.
    Farrar JT
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):163-164. PubMed ID: 20347224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical effectiveness: an approach to clinical trial design more relevant to clinical practice, acknowledging the importance of individual differences.
    Moore RA; Derry S; McQuay HJ; Straube S; Aldington D; Wiffen P; Bell RF; Kalso E; Rowbotham MC;
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):173-176. PubMed ID: 19748185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RCTs of psychological treatments for chronic pain: progress and challenges.
    Morley S; Williams ACC
    Pain; 2006 Apr; 121(3):171-172. PubMed ID: 16513271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does pain matter? Acknowledging the subjectivity of clinical significance.
    Birnie KA; McGrath PJ; Chambers CT
    Pain; 2012 Dec; 153(12):2311-2314. PubMed ID: 22995250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What works for whom, when and how?
    Seers K
    Pain; 2009 Jun; 143(3):167-168. PubMed ID: 19339114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progressing towards acceptable treatment outcomes.
    Vowles KE; Robinson ME
    Pain; 2009 Aug; 144(3):228-229. PubMed ID: 19500909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
    Turk DC; Dworkin RH; Burke LB; Gershon R; Rothman M; Scott J; Allen RR; Atkinson HJ; Chandler J; Cleeland C; Cowan P; Dimitrova R; Dionne R; Farrar JT; Haythornthwaite JA; Hertz S; Jadad AR; Jensen MP; Kellstein D; Kerns RD; Manning DC; Martin S; Max MB; McDermott MP; McGrath P; Moulin DE; Nurmikko T; Quessy S; Raja S; Rappaport BA; Rauschkolb C; Robinson JP; Royal MA; Simon L; Stauffer JW; Stucki G; Tollett J; von Stein T; Wallace MS; Wernicke J; White RE; Williams AC; Witter J; Wyrwich KW
    Pain; 2006 Dec; 125(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 17069973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple analyses in clinical trials: sound science or data dredging?
    Lord SJ; Gebski VJ; Keech AC
    Med J Aust; 2004 Oct; 181(8):452-4. PubMed ID: 15487966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How much statistics do we need?
    Bacharova L
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jan; 40(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 16916520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Methodological basis for evidence-based medicine].
    Windeler J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jul; 70(7):418-27; quiz 428. PubMed ID: 18729032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: description, application, and alternatives.
    Jacobson NS; Roberts LJ; Berns SB; McGlinchey JB
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1999 Jun; 67(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 10369050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. N-of-1 trials in oncology.
    Collette L; Tombal B
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Aug; 16(8):885-6. PubMed ID: 26248830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance.
    Kendall PC; Marrs-Garcia A; Nath SR; Sheldrick RC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1999 Jun; 67(3):285-99. PubMed ID: 10369049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A response to Wasan editorial "Spinal cord stimulation in a workers' compensation population: how difficult it can be to interpret a clinical trial": stimulating discussion.
    Turner JA; Hollingworth W; Comstock BA; Deyo RA
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):406-407. PubMed ID: 20207083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity scores: a practical method for assessing treatment effects in pain and symptom management research.
    Garrido MM
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Oct; 48(4):711-8. PubMed ID: 24937162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reply to Drs. Olanow and Rascol.
    Ahlskog JE; Uitti RJ
    Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1151. PubMed ID: 20368636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.