BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18455438)

  • 1. The image of motor units architecture in the mechanomyographic signal during the single motor unit contraction: in vivo and simulation study.
    Kaczmarek P; Celichowski J; Drzymała-Celichowska H; Kasiński A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):553-63. PubMed ID: 18455438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimentally verified model of mechanomyograms recorded during single motor unit contractions.
    Kaczmarek P; Celichowski J; Kasiński A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Dec; 15(6):617-30. PubMed ID: 16055349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electromyographic and mechanomyographic estimation of motor unit activation strategy in voluntary force production.
    Akataki K; Mita K; Watakabe M
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 44(8):489-96. PubMed ID: 15646006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-invasive characterization of single motor unit electromyographic and mechanomyographic activities in the biceps brachii muscle.
    Cescon C; Sguazzi E; Merletti R; Farina D
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Feb; 16(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 16112874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the frequency content of the surface mechanomyographic signal reflect motor unit firing rates? A brief review.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Cramer JT; Weir JP; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16497517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses to eccentric muscle contractions.
    Coburn JW; Housh TJ; Malek MH; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Beck TW; Johnson GO
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 May; 33(5):664-71. PubMed ID: 16435341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulse charge and not waveform affects M-wave properties during progressive motor unit activation.
    Botter A; Merletti R; Minetto MA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 18455437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-dimensional spatial distribution of surface mechanomyographical response to single motor unit activity.
    Cescon C; Madeleine P; Graven-Nielsen T; Merletti R; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Jan; 159(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16876257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motor unit synchronization during fatigue: a novel quantification method.
    Grönlund C; Holtermann A; Roeleveld K; Karlsson JS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):242-51. PubMed ID: 18036832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals.
    Gazzoni M; Farina D; Merletti R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 15183268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram.
    Holobar A; Farina D; Gazzoni M; Merletti R; Zazula D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):551-62. PubMed ID: 19208498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimentally verified mathematical approach for the prediction of force developed by motor units at variable frequency stimulation patterns.
    Raikova R; Rusev R; Drzymała-Celichowska H; Krutki P; Aladjov H; Celichowski J
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(8):1546-52. PubMed ID: 20185140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a piezoelectric contact sensor and an accelerometer for examining mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Aug; 16(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 16243542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial and force dependency of mechanomyographic signal features.
    Madeleine P; Cescon C; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Nov; 158(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 16808977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor unit acceleration maps and interference mechanomyographic distribution.
    Farina D; Li X; Madeleine P
    J Biomech; 2008 Sep; 41(13):2843-9. PubMed ID: 18722620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses to repeated concentric muscle actions of the quadriceps femoris.
    Ebersole KT; O'Connor KM; Wier AP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16139522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanomyograms recorded during evoked contractions of single motor units in the rat medial gastrocnemius muscle.
    Bichler E
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Nov; 83(4 -5):310-9. PubMed ID: 11138569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motor unit synchronization during fatigue: described with a novel sEMG method based on large motor unit samples.
    Holtermann A; Grönlund C; Karlsson JS; Roeleveld K
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 18207421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses to stimulated and voluntary contractions in the dorsiflexors of young and old men.
    Shima N; McNeil CJ; Rice CL
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Mar; 35(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 17143886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time and frequency domain responses of the mechanomyogram and electromyogram during isometric ramp contractions: a comparison of the short-time Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms.
    Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Egan AD; Hartman MJ; Herda TJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 17070700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.