109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18455677)
1. Comparing BMD results between two similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change.
Shepherd JA; Morgan SL; Lu Y
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 18455677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Lu Y
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 17616413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of individual patients on two DXA scanners of the same manufacturer.
Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 11095175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.
Gagnon DR; McLean RR; Hannan MT; Cupples LA; Hogan M; Kiel DP
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 20347371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading.
Blake GM
Calcif Tissue Int; 1996 Jul; 59(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8661987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced Precision of the New Hologic Horizon Model Compared With the Old Discovery Model Is Less Evident When Fewer Vertebrae Are Included in the Analysis.
McNamara EA; Kilim HP; Malabanan AO; Whittaker LG; Rosen HN
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 27422238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
Faulkner KG; Roberts LA; McClung MR
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(6):432-6. PubMed ID: 9116387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct Comparison of the Precision of the New Hologic Horizon Model With the Old Discovery Model.
Whittaker LG; McNamara EA; Vath S; Shaw E; Malabanan AO; Parker RA; Rosen HN
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):524-528. PubMed ID: 29254605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database.
Benmalek A; Sabatier JP
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
