197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18455865)
1. Reichman O, Gdansky E, Latinsky B, Labi S, Samueloff A. "Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section" [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 136 (2008) 25-28].
McQuivey RW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):e3-4. PubMed ID: 18455865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section.
Reichman O; Gdansky E; Latinsky B; Labi S; Samueloff A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 17368909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Correcting occiput posterior position during labor: the role of maternal positions].
Guittier MJ; Othenin-Girard V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Apr; 40(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 22099975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Manual rotation of occiput posterior presentation].
Le Ray C; Goffinet F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Oct; 39(10):575-8. PubMed ID: 21924659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital and Manual Rotation of the Persistent Occiput Posterior Fetus.
Elmore C; McBroom K; Ellis J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 May; 65(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 32491235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The fetal occiput posterior position: state of the science and a new perspective.
Simkin P
Birth; 2010 Mar; 37(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 20402724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Occipito-posterior positioning and some ideas about how to change it!
Sutton J
Pract Midwife; 2000 Jun; 3(6):20-2. PubMed ID: 11260992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Persistent Occiput Posterior position - OUTcomes following manual rotation (POP-OUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Phipps H; Hyett JA; Kuah S; Pardey J; Ludlow J; Bisits A; Park F; Kowalski D; de Vries B
Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():96. PubMed ID: 25872776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Occipito-posterior fetal head position, maternal and neonatal outcome].
Martino V; Iliceto N; Simeoni U
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 17923836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Lédée et al. Management in intractable obstetric haemorrhage: an audit study on 61 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;94:189-96.
Mousa HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Dec; 100(1):116-7. PubMed ID: 11728673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Back labor.
Stillerman E
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2009-2010 Winter; (92):20-2. PubMed ID: 20092139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate.
Le Ray C; Serres P; Schmitz T; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):873-9. PubMed ID: 17906022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Manual rotation of vertex presentations in posterior occipital-iliac or transverse position. Technique and value].
Haddad B; Abirached F; Calvez G; Cabrol D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 7782591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour: a survey of obstetric practice in Australia and New Zealand.
Phipps H; de Vries B; Lee PN; Hyett JA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Oct; 52(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 22804812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and the miscredit of top-up epidurals: Commentary on "Risk factors for and consequences of difficult fetal extraction in emergency caesarean section. A retrospective registry-based cohort study" [Ammitzbøll et al., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 74-80].
Wikkelsø AJ; Kromann ME; Nedergaard HK; Bøgeskov RA; Andersson ML; Duch P; Fuhrmann L; Lindelof K; Rian O; Pedersen LM; Jain D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jul; 286():145-146. PubMed ID: 37198056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lateral asymmetric decubitus position for the rotation of occipito-posterior positions: multicenter randomized controlled trial EVADELA.
Le Ray C; Lepleux F; De La Calle A; Guerin J; Sellam N; Dreyfus M; Chantry AA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):511.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27242201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External cephalic version.
Committee on Practice Guidelines--Gynecology, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Feb; 72(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 11291628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Preventive version of breech presentation--first results and complications].
Kyank HR; Severin W; Stranz G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(16):1008-13. PubMed ID: 919870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the external cephalic version in the management of dystocia].
Besio M; Coto M
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 7569161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [About: "Decision-to-deliver interval for forceps delivery and cesarean section"(J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, n 8-2005)].
Schaal JP
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Apr; 35(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 16575369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
