BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18456144)

  • 1. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
    Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
    Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
    Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
    Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent.
    Kao CT; Ding SJ; Wang CK; He H; Chou MY; Huang TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):568.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17110251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.
    Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Barbato E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 18174077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets.
    Reicheneder CA; Baumert U; Gedrange T; Proff P; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 17702795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
    Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of ligation on frictional resistance to sliding during repeated displacement.
    Sirisaowaluk N; Kravchuk O; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 17203578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
    Henao SP; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 65.