These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18456250)

  • 1. The allure of equality: uniformity in probabilistic and statistical judgment.
    Falk R; Lann A
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Dec; 57(4):293-334. PubMed ID: 18456250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-trend-related differences in tasks involving conjunctive probabilistic reasoning.
    Chiesi F; Gronchi G; Primi C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 18778147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partition-edit-count: naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):626-42. PubMed ID: 15584810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty.
    Hansson P; Juslin P; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1027-42. PubMed ID: 18763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.
    Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):780-805. PubMed ID: 19379049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.
    Hahn U; Warren PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.
    Juslin P; Winman A; Hansson P
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):678-703. PubMed ID: 17638502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.
    Crupi V; Tentori K; Lombardi L
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):971-85. PubMed ID: 19839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The probability of causal conditionals.
    Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [How can one improve the understanding and communication of the importance of medical test results?].
    Hoffrage U; Kurzenhäuser S; Gigerenzer G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):713-9. PubMed ID: 11127778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why does the base rate appear to be ignored? The equiprobability hypothesis.
    Hattori M; Nishida Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1065-70. PubMed ID: 19966256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation.
    Winman A; Hansson P; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1167-75. PubMed ID: 15521796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.