These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18456250)

  • 41. Intuition in the context of object perception: intuitive gestalt judgments rest on the unconscious activation of semantic representations.
    Bolte A; Goschke T
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):608-16. PubMed ID: 18572154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of heuristics in intuitive mathematical judgment.
    Reber R; Brun M; Mitterndorfer K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1174-8. PubMed ID: 19001586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Testing a counter-intuitive prediction of optimal cue combination.
    Muller CM; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 18983869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight.
    Sanna LJ; Schwarz N; Stocker SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 12018501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Judgments of cause and blame: the effects of intentionality and foreseeability.
    Lagnado DA; Channon S
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):754-70. PubMed ID: 18706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion.
    Fiedler K; Freytag P; Meiser T
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):187-206. PubMed ID: 19159153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Statistical considerations for weight variation and content uniformity tests].
    Katori N
    Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku; 1994; (112):200-1. PubMed ID: 8854932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The proximity heuristic in judgments of accident probabilities.
    Teigen KH
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):423-40. PubMed ID: 16248934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Regulating under uncertainty: newsboy for exposure limits.
    Cooke RM; Macdonell M
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 18643816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.
    Tubau E; Aguilar-Lleyda D; Johnson ED
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():353. PubMed ID: 25873906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Inferences from memory: strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared.
    Persson M; Rieskamp J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18986638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On the probability of correct selection for large k populations, with application to microarray data.
    Cui X; Wilson J
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):870-83. PubMed ID: 18932145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Are people excessive or judicious in their egocentrism? A modeling approach to understanding bias and accuracy in people's optimism.
    Windschitl PD; Rose JP; Stalkfleet MT; Smith AR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18665701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The hazards of underspecified models: the case of symmetry in everyday predictions.
    Sedlmeier P; Kilinç B
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):770-80. PubMed ID: 15250783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
    Mata A; Ferreira MB; Voss A; Kollei T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1980-1986. PubMed ID: 28138834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative thinking.
    Mussweiler T; Epstude K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19203167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus).
    Irie-Sugimoto N; Kobayashi T; Sato T; Hasegawa T
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jan; 12(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 18712531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.