These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The theory of the curvature-constraint line for amodal completion. Takeichi H; Nakazawa H; Murakami I; Shimojo S Perception; 1995; 24(4):373-89. PubMed ID: 7675618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shape detection of Gaborized outline versions of everyday objects. Sassi M; Machilsen B; Wagemans J Iperception; 2012; 3(10):745-64. PubMed ID: 23483752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of contour continuity and closure in three-month-olds. Gerhardstein P; Kovacs I; Ditre J; Feher A Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):2981-8. PubMed ID: 15474571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns. Corradi G; Rosselló-Mir J; Vañó J; Chuquichambi E; Bertamini M; Munar E Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):670-685. PubMed ID: 30536967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of orientation jitter and motion on contour saliency and object identification. Nygård GE; Looy TV; Wagemans J Vision Res; 2009 Oct; 49(20):2475-84. PubMed ID: 19665470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Visual interpolation is not scale invariant. Gerbino W; Fantoni C Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3142-59. PubMed ID: 16782166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recovering metric properties of objects through spatiotemporal interpolation. Ghose T; Liu J; Kellman PJ Vision Res; 2014 Sep; 102():80-8. PubMed ID: 25111311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects. Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How shape from contours affects shape from shading. Todorović D Vision Res; 2014 Oct; 103():1-10. PubMed ID: 25130407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Recognition of objects displayed with incomplete sets of discrete boundary dots. Greene E Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1043-59. PubMed ID: 17879637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Observational drawing biases are predicted by biases in perception: Empirical support of the misperception hypothesis of drawing accuracy with respect to two angle illusions. Ostrofsky J; Kozbelt A; Cohen DJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):1007-25. PubMed ID: 25405522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Rossion B; Pourtois G Perception; 2004; 33(2):217-36. PubMed ID: 15109163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contour grouping: closure effects are explained by good continuation and proximity. Tversky T; Geisler WS; Perry JS Vision Res; 2004 Nov; 44(24):2769-77. PubMed ID: 15342221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]