These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18457787)

  • 1. Improving readability of an evaluation tool for low-income clients using visual information processing theories.
    Townsend MS; Sylva K; Martin A; Metz D; Wooten-Swanson P
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2008; 40(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 18457787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure.
    Michielutte R; Bahnson J; Dignan MB; Schroeder EM
    J Cancer Educ; 1992; 7(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 1419592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exploratory study of older adults' comprehension of printed cancer information: is readability a key factor?
    Friedman DB; Hoffman-Goetz L
    J Health Commun; 2007; 12(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 17710594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
    Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
    J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.
    Wilson M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital photo receivers deliver herbal education for low-income persons.
    Lohse B; Rifkin R; Krall JS
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2009; 41(6):438-40. PubMed ID: 19879502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of text characteristics on perceived and actual difficulty of health information.
    Leroy G; Helmreich S; Cowie JR
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jun; 79(6):438-49. PubMed ID: 20202895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ABOP, the automatic patient information leaflet optimizer: evaluation of a tool in development.
    Franck MC; Foulon V; Van Vaerenbergh L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):411-6. PubMed ID: 21621946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The numeracy demands of health education information: an examination of numerical concepts in written diabetes materials.
    Joram E; Roberts-Dobie S; Mattison SJ; Devlin M; Herbrandson K; Hansen K; Eslinger D
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(4):344-55. PubMed ID: 21916698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive testing with female nutrition and education assistance program participants informs validity of the Satter eating competence inventory.
    Krall JS; Lohse B
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2010; 42(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 20579611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the literacy achievement gap: a longitudinal study of kindergarten through third grade.
    Foster WA; Miller M
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Jul; 38(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 17625043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tips for improving patient education materials. The right readability level is one key to success.
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Oct; 14(2):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10175257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of readability in effective health communication: an experiment using a Japanese health information text on chronic suppurative otitis media.
    Sakai Y
    Health Info Libr J; 2013 Sep; 30(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 23981023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive Interviewing to Enhance Comprehension and Accuracy of Responses to a Spanish-Language Nutrition Program Evaluation Tool.
    Dickin KL; Larios F; Parra PA
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2015; 47(5):465-71.e1. PubMed ID: 26209887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Printed health information materials: evaluation of readability and suitability.
    Shieh C; Hosei B
    J Community Health Nurs; 2008; 25(2):73-90. PubMed ID: 18449833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing readability of consumer health information: an exploratory study.
    Gemoets D; Rosemblat G; Tse T; Logan R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):869-73. PubMed ID: 15360936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.
    Kasabwala K; Agarwal N; Hansberry DR; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 22473833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are end-of-life patient education materials readable?
    Ache KA; Wallace LS
    Palliat Med; 2009 Sep; 23(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 19460831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing nutrition education for patients with low literacy skills.
    Macario E; Emmons KM; Sorensen G; Hunt MK; Rudd RE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 May; 98(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 9597029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.