These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18458099)

  • 1. Having one's cake and eating it, too: combining true experiments with regression discontinuity designs.
    Mandell MB
    Eval Rev; 2008 Oct; 32(5):415-34. PubMed ID: 18458099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice.
    Moscoe E; Bor J; Bärnighausen T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 25579639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating disease management programme effectiveness: an introduction to the regression discontinuity design.
    Linden A; Adams JL; Roberts N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16579820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment.
    Shadish WR; Galindo R; Wong VC; Steiner PM; Cook TD
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 21534684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining the regression discontinuity design and propensity score-based weighting to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
    Linden A; Adams JL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 22304484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions.
    Shadish WR; Cook TD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():607-29. PubMed ID: 18616391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RD or Not RD: Using Experimental Studies to Assess the Performance of the Regression Discontinuity Approach.
    Gleason P; Resch A; Berk J
    Eval Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):3-33. PubMed ID: 30126296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intuitive theories of information: beliefs about the value of redundancy.
    Soll JB
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):317-46. PubMed ID: 10090806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: an update for psychophysiological researchers.
    Keselman HJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 9643062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal designs for studying bioimpedance.
    McGree JM; Duffull SB; Eccleston JA; Ward LC
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1465-83. PubMed ID: 18057512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On reference designs for microarray experiments.
    Steibel JP; Rosa GJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article36. PubMed ID: 16646855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating heritability of gene expression using parent-offspring regression with 2-channel microarrays.
    Albouyeh R; Ritland K
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 18836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists.
    Witt J; Scott A; Osborne RH
    Health Econ; 2009 Jun; 18(6):681-96. PubMed ID: 18770875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
    Brooks JM; Fang G
    Clin Ther; 2009 Apr; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.
    Imai K
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4857-73. PubMed ID: 18618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical power for the comparative regression discontinuity design with a nonequivalent comparison group.
    Tang Y; Cook TD; Kisbu-Sakarya Y
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):150-168. PubMed ID: 28301197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating disease risk associated with mutated genes in family-based designs.
    Choi YH; Kopciuk KA; Briollais L
    Hum Hered; 2008; 66(4):238-51. PubMed ID: 18612208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A general method for describing sources of variance in clinical trials, especially operator variance, in order to improve transfer of research knowledge to practice.
    Chambers DW; Leknius C; Reid L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19141049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.